Days/Months to mNAV cover is too generous in a bull run and too conservative in a bear dip... Perhaps we can improve on it by subtracting the efforts of king BTC and leaving just the efforts of the capital raisers instead? That would show who is being more industrious. To make…
Unsure if the math would work at first glance? If we exclude BTC price change effects, how do you calculate the treasury? Without the treasury, there's no mNAV to compute, creating a circular problem. Or do i misunderstand your point? P.s. i don't think we should overcomplicate…
To be fair, I like your idea of looking at days to cover sats per share. I.e. a BTCTC has 100 sats / share now, and you but it at a valuation of 200 sats / share. How long until they increase the sats per share to 200? This rewards non dilutive increases more and is more…
But it’s the same metric. If you buy a company at a 3 mNAv and it holds 100 sats per share you need 300 sats per share to break even on your investment measured in BTC (3x100). That’s a 200% btc yield needed. And the time to cover that 200% BTC yield js calculated by the time to…
Are you sure? My understanding was that mNAV is derived from the fiat ratio of the market cap to net assets. Since the price of bitcoin is dynamic, even if the sats per share doesn't change AND the share price doesn't change, mNAV can still vary because of BTC price changes. My…
United States Trends
- 1. Bengals 56.1K posts
- 2. Bengals 56.1K posts
- 3. Packers 57.2K posts
- 4. Panthers 46.7K posts
- 5. Joe Flacco 5,727 posts
- 6. Colts 37.7K posts
- 7. Steelers 55.2K posts
- 8. Lions 61.7K posts
- 9. #KeepPounding 7,251 posts
- 10. FanDuel 44.5K posts
- 11. Falcons 29.4K posts
- 12. Drake London 7,316 posts
- 13. Broncos 33.8K posts
- 14. Caleb 37K posts
- 15. Daniel Jones 8,942 posts
- 16. Zac Taylor 2,915 posts
- 17. #Skol 4,740 posts
- 18. Vikings 39.5K posts
- 19. Colston Loveland 8,431 posts
- 20. Jordan Love 9,253 posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.