#probabilityboundsanalysis search results

No results for "#probabilityboundsanalysis"
No results for "#probabilityboundsanalysis"
No results for "#probabilityboundsanalysis"

This figure is insane. The extreme underrepresentation of z-values between -2 and 2 (which is just around the commonly used p-value threshold of 0.05) demonstrates publication bias/p-hacking/etc. Sharp edge near the threshold. Source: arxiv.org/abs/2009.09440

Scientific_Bird's tweet image. This figure is insane.

The extreme underrepresentation of z-values between -2 and 2 (which is just around the commonly used p-value threshold of 0.05) demonstrates publication bias/p-hacking/etc. Sharp edge near the threshold. 

Source:
arxiv.org/abs/2009.09440
Scientific_Bird's tweet image. This figure is insane.

The extreme underrepresentation of z-values between -2 and 2 (which is just around the commonly used p-value threshold of 0.05) demonstrates publication bias/p-hacking/etc. Sharp edge near the threshold. 

Source:
arxiv.org/abs/2009.09440

Sketch dump ★ these are some studies I did recently~ I tried some perspective stuff, pretty happy with them!

likelihood_art's tweet image. Sketch dump ★ these are some studies I did recently~ 
I tried some perspective stuff, pretty happy with them!
likelihood_art's tweet image. Sketch dump ★ these are some studies I did recently~ 
I tried some perspective stuff, pretty happy with them!
likelihood_art's tweet image. Sketch dump ★ these are some studies I did recently~ 
I tried some perspective stuff, pretty happy with them!
likelihood_art's tweet image. Sketch dump ★ these are some studies I did recently~ 
I tried some perspective stuff, pretty happy with them!

Probability, Stochastic Processes and Optimization:

probnstat's tweet image. Probability, Stochastic Processes and Optimization:

People often ask me how to know for sure if an image was created by artificial intelligence. So I marked in the attached photo (in the red circles) some clues that make me suspect that it is a fabricated photo, although it cannot be said with absolute certainty in this case.

bykellymcd's tweet image. People often ask me how to know for sure if an image was created by artificial intelligence. So I marked in the attached photo (in the red circles) some clues that make me suspect that it is a fabricated photo, although it cannot be said with absolute certainty in this case.

How to Frame a High Probability Setup in a Simple guideline : 🧵

Sholly_Pee1's tweet image. How to Frame a High Probability Setup in a Simple guideline :

 🧵

Neural networks can be vulnerable to adversarial noise. We demonstrate the remarkable effectiveness of interval bound propagation in training provably robust image classifiers: arxiv.org/abs/1810.12715


Hypothesis Test Statistics & Confidence Intervals! Image Credit- Professor Jahn

PythonPr's tweet image. Hypothesis Test Statistics & Confidence Intervals!
Image Credit- Professor Jahn

1/7 On EXPECTATION MAXIMIZATION (EM) ALGORITHM:

probnstat's tweet image. 1/7

On EXPECTATION MAXIMIZATION (EM) ALGORITHM:

Confidence level: tried 5 filters 💁‍♀️ Which one’s your fave?

Coral_Candy_Ai's tweet image. Confidence level: tried 5 filters 💁‍♀️ Which one’s your fave?

Which pattern do you think is High Probability here & why?

Hydra_Thahmid's tweet image. Which pattern do you think is High Probability here & why?

1/7 On BINOMIAL PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION:

probnstat's tweet image. 1/7

On BINOMIAL PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION:

It's getting harder and harder to tell if an image was generated by artificial intelligence. I've circled some clues here that might mean this is AI.

drpollyphd's tweet image. It's getting harder and harder to tell if an image was generated by artificial intelligence. I've circled some clues here that might mean this is AI.

Factorization Criterion for Sufficient Statistics.

probnstat's tweet image. Factorization Criterion for Sufficient Statistics.

For years I've shown this 2x2 grid in talks on infinite width networks, but with just a big ❓ in the upper-left. No longer! In arxiv.org/abs/2206.07673 we characterize wide Bayesian neural nets in parameter space. This fills a theory gap, and enables *much* faster MCMC sampling.

jaschasd's tweet image. For years I've shown this 2x2 grid in talks on infinite width networks, but with just a big ❓ in the upper-left.

No longer! In arxiv.org/abs/2206.07673 we characterize wide Bayesian neural nets in parameter space. This fills a theory gap, and enables *much* faster MCMC sampling.

i have a solution in 85 bytes. tested with [ 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3 ]

EmanueleRodola's tweet image. i have a solution in 85 bytes. tested with [ 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3 ]
EmanueleRodola's tweet image. i have a solution in 85 bytes. tested with [ 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3 ]
EmanueleRodola's tweet image. i have a solution in 85 bytes. tested with [ 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3 ]

Some probability distributions Image link: images.app.goo.gl/vsjG1SJyM8pSos…

probnstat's tweet image. Some probability distributions

Image link: images.app.goo.gl/vsjG1SJyM8pSos…

A clever way to compute probabilities without computing integrals.

probnstat's tweet image. A clever way to compute probabilities without computing integrals.

Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Uniform random variable

probnstat's tweet image. Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Uniform random variable

Loading...

Something went wrong.


Something went wrong.


United States Trends