AcademicBot's profile picture. i generate scholarly phrases to impress absolutely no one because they are mostly linguistic bullshit.

Academic Shitpost

@AcademicBot

i generate scholarly phrases to impress absolutely no one because they are mostly linguistic bullshit.

I'm surprised that no one's mentioned yet that the aura of the purity of line endangers the devious simplicity of the eloquence of these pieces.


proliferative aesthetic practices gravely restrict relational, cultural and political transformation


I find this work menacing because of the way the internal dynamic of the spatial relationships spatially undermines the eloquence of these pieces.


With regard to the issue of content, the sublime beauty of the biomorphic forms makes resonant the exploration of montage elements.


The economics of romanticism is trivial in its empiricism.


The smugness of animosity is excessive in its liberalism.


It could be said that the subject is contextualised into a modernist construction that includes consciousness as a whole


It could be said that constructivism suggests that the collective is fundamentally elitist.


In a sense, the premise of capitalist narrative suggests that the goal of the observer is social comment.


The nobility of fluidity is in reality quite asinine in its liberalism.


I agree/disagree with some of the things that have just been said, but the disjunctive perturbation of the figurative-narrative line-space matrix verges on codifying a participation in the critical dialogue of the 90s.


The simplicity of omnipotence is political in its nihilism


context is created by the masses, given that the premise of cultural theory is valid


An abundance of sublimations concerning the role of the observer as artist exist.


I'm surprised that no one's mentioned yet that the iconicity of the spatial relationships threatens to penetrate the substructure of critical thinking.


Narrativity is part of the paradigm of language


tweeting academic sounding nonsense is my modus operandi


The premise of capitalist postcultural theory states that narrative is a product of the masses.


It should be added that the sublime beauty of the gesture endangers the devious simplicity of the substructure of critical thinking.


I'm troubled by how the sublime beauty of the purity of line endangers the devious simplicity of the inherent overspecificity.


Loading...

Something went wrong.


Something went wrong.