CFB_Data's profile picture. Bill Radjewski (aka BlueSCar) | Software guy who dabbles in analytics | http://patreon.com/collegefootballdata

Bill Radjewski | CollegeFootballData.com

@CFB_Data

Bill Radjewski (aka BlueSCar) | Software guy who dabbles in analytics | http://patreon.com/collegefootballdata

Pinned

📦 The CFBD Starter Pack is officially live! Whether you're building models, dashboards, or just exploring data, this is your launchpad. What’s inside + how to get it 👇 #cfb #cfbd #sportsanalytics


The 61% success rate given up by Wink Martindale's defense against USC is the worst I have on record for all Michigan games dating back to 2003. Next worst games: - 58.9% against Wisconsin in 2020 - 57.1% against NIU in 2005 Seems bad!

CFB_Data's tweet image. The 61% success rate given up by Wink Martindale's defense against USC is the worst I have on record for all Michigan games dating back to 2003.

Next worst games:

- 58.9% against Wisconsin in 2020
- 57.1% against NIU in 2005

Seems bad!

Ever wondered how a player’s shot mix actually breaks down? 🏀 Here’s a quick look from one of the new Jupyter notebooks in the College Basketball Data Starter Pack: stacked shot shares by type (dunks, layups, jumpers, 3s). Available now on Gumroad: buff.ly/aJuInMK

CFB_Data's tweet image. Ever wondered how a player’s shot mix actually breaks down? 🏀

Here’s a quick look from one of the new Jupyter notebooks in the College Basketball Data Starter Pack: stacked shot shares by type (dunks, layups, jumpers, 3s).

Available now on Gumroad: buff.ly/aJuInMK

Bill Radjewski | CollegeFootballData.com reposted

We crunched 368 CFB coaches (2015-2024) to settle the debate—Offense or Defense background for head coaching success? Takeaway: Offensive guys had a net of 0.8 more expected wins and a higher WOE% than Defensive experienced head coaches. WOE: Wins over Expected Expected…

ArkansasQuant's tweet image. We crunched 368 CFB coaches (2015-2024) to settle the debate—Offense or Defense background for head coaching success? 

Takeaway: Offensive guys had a net of 0.8 more expected wins and a higher WOE% than Defensive experienced head coaches.  

WOE: Wins over Expected

Expected…
ArkansasQuant's tweet image. We crunched 368 CFB coaches (2015-2024) to settle the debate—Offense or Defense background for head coaching success? 

Takeaway: Offensive guys had a net of 0.8 more expected wins and a higher WOE% than Defensive experienced head coaches.  

WOE: Wins over Expected

Expected…
ArkansasQuant's tweet image. We crunched 368 CFB coaches (2015-2024) to settle the debate—Offense or Defense background for head coaching success? 

Takeaway: Offensive guys had a net of 0.8 more expected wins and a higher WOE% than Defensive experienced head coaches.  

WOE: Wins over Expected

Expected…
ArkansasQuant's tweet image. We crunched 368 CFB coaches (2015-2024) to settle the debate—Offense or Defense background for head coaching success? 

Takeaway: Offensive guys had a net of 0.8 more expected wins and a higher WOE% than Defensive experienced head coaches.  

WOE: Wins over Expected

Expected…

Loading...

Something went wrong.


Something went wrong.