Data Colada
@DataColada
This account does not retweet. Actually it is not even monitored.
You might like
The lawsuit against Data Colada includes interesting evidence. This table summarizes it. For more details check out our post datacolada.org/114
Want to know how many people show an effect in an RCT, policy experiment or between-subjects lab experiment? Consider this off-label use of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test datacolada.org/120
Hidden Confound in Pre-Registrations Critique datacolada.org/119 Post ends with link to submit suggestions for AsPredicted & OSF
In this blogpost timestamps were used to infer the fake data were coming from inside the lab... datacolada.org/117
How is the Gino trial going? datacolada.org/116
Colada[115] shows the prevalence of pre-registrations in papers published in 2022, with lessons on how to improve in 2023+ datacolada.org/115
![DataColada's tweet image. Colada[115] shows the prevalence of pre-registrations in papers published in 2022, with lessons on how to improve in 2023+
datacolada.org/115](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F-3leNAXIAAQC5_.jpg)
A thank you & an update from 'three relatively unknown guys' datacolada.org/113
datacolada.org
[113] Data Litigada: Thank You (And An Update) - Data Colada
Thank You A few months ago we reported evidence of data tampering in four papers that have since been retracted (or re-retracted) (Colada[109] .htm). A few weeks ago we were sued for doing so (Vox...
Data Falsificada Part 4 - "Forgetting the Words" Data tampering in this JPSP 2020 article is revealed by a variable that was collected but not analyzed, and thus left behind when the other variables were tampered with datacolada.org/112
datacolada.org
[112] Data Falsificada (Part 4): "Forgetting The Words" - Data Colada
This is the last post in a four-part series detailing evidence of fraud in four academic papers co-authored by Harvard Business School Professor Francesca Gino. It is worth reiterating two things....
Post 3 in the Data Falsificada Series. We manage to identify which observations were tampered with and by how much the dependent variable was modified by hand. datacolada.org/111
datacolada.org
[111] Data Falsificada (Part 3): "The Cheaters Are Out of Order" - Data Colada
This is the third in a four-part series of posts detailing evidence of fraud in four academic papers co-authored by Harvard Business School Professor Francesca Gino. It is worth reiterating that to...
Second post of a four-post series on Data Falsificada. datacolada.org/110 Includes message to 148 Gino Co-Authors
The first of a four-post series on Data Falsificada datacolada.org/109
datacolada.org
[109] Data Falsificada (Part 1): "Clusterfake" - Data Colada
This is the introduction to a four-part series of posts detailing evidence of fraud in four academic papers co-authored by Harvard Business School Professor Francesca Gino. In 2021, we and a team of...
For version control in R, Microsoft used to archive R packages (MRAN). Now Groundhog does it (GRAN). datacolada.org/108 Also: just released Groundhog 3.1.0 fixes some bugs in v3.0.0 (blog post talks about 3.0.0) #rstats
Meaningless Means #3: Averaging Nuns and Chocolate datacolada.org/107
Meaningless Means #1: The average effect of nudging datacolada.org/105
Our series on meta-analysis & meaningless means datacolada.org/104
![DataColada's tweet card. This post is an introduction to a series of posts about meta-analysis [1]. We think that many, perhaps most, meta-analyses in the behavioral sciences are invalid. In this introductory post, we make...](https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/1988413958932623363/qO_vS6u7?format=jpg&name=orig)
Mediation analysis is more invalid than you think. datacolada.org/103
![DataColada's tweet card. Mediation analysis is very common in behavioral science despite suffering from many invalidating shortcomings. While most of the shortcomings are intuitive [1], this post focuses on a counterintuit...](https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/1987835878945738752/QILhfG-A?format=jpg&name=orig)
Transparency makes research evaluable datacolada.org/101
datacolada.org
[101] Transparency Makes Research Evaluable: Evaluating a Field Experiment on Crime Published in...
A recently published Nature paper (.htm) examined an interesting psychological hypothesis and applied it to a policy relevant question. The authors ran an ambitious field experiment and posted all...
United States Trends
- 1. South Carolina 23.8K posts
- 2. Texas A&M 22.1K posts
- 3. Shane Beamer 2,866 posts
- 4. Sellers 13.3K posts
- 5. Marcel Reed 3,899 posts
- 6. Michigan 43.8K posts
- 7. Northwestern 6,367 posts
- 8. Underwood 3,619 posts
- 9. Sherrone Moore N/A
- 10. #GoBlue 3,159 posts
- 11. College Station 2,748 posts
- 12. Semaj Morgan N/A
- 13. Nyck Harbor 2,733 posts
- 14. Heisman 5,558 posts
- 15. Elko 3,567 posts
- 16. Andrew Marsh N/A
- 17. TAMU 6,714 posts
- 18. Navy 30.1K posts
- 19. #GigEm 1,583 posts
- 20. Narduzzi 1,424 posts
You might like
-
Andrew Gelman et al.
@StatModeling -
Josh Angrist
@metrics52 -
I4R
@I4Replication -
PNAS Nexus
@PNASNexus -
Jeffrey Wooldridge
@jmwooldridge -
John A. List
@Econ_4_Everyone -
Leonie
@helloiamleonie -
Alex Mas
@AMLabEcon -
Die With Zero by Bill Perkins
@DieWithZero -
Dean Karlan
@deankarlan -
Probable Causation
@ProbCausation -
Stefano DellaVigna
@sdellavi -
scott cunningham
@causalinf -
Lawrence Katz
@lkatz42 -
Anya Samek 🇺🇦
@AnyaSamek
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.