DefenderOfBasic's profile picture. ORI

Defender

@DefenderOfBasic

ORI

مثبتة

there are two types of human cognition that all humans can switch between

DefenderOfBasic's tweet image. there are two types of human cognition that all humans can switch between

Defender أعاد

One counter: we have many subagents inside us and they don't always get along well with each other (re: the obstacle to full body synchronization of vibrations is often the fact that subagents don't want to synchronize and so will distract you and make it hard). :-)


Defender أعاد

This. It’s soo exciting to just dream big


Are you aware of how Lex friedman got started / became popular / got his first big hit?


Defender أعاد

most arguments are actually about relevance, not facts or theories


Defender أعاد

I’ll give it another shot. @TimHenke9 @spuds600 care to help me out? Category theory can be describe as a “mathematics of mathematics”. This causes non-math mystical types to project half baked “theories of everything” onto it. Does this happen with set/model theory as well?


Defender أعاد

This plus "The Master and his Emissary" are critical keys to re-enchanting the world. Much of religious language becomes totally coherent again after digesting these ideas. Human minds function with far more weirdness than you were taught. These books disassemble your materialism

AI is still operating under a model of bicameral consciousness.

Cernovich's tweet image. AI is still operating under a model of bicameral consciousness.
Cernovich's tweet image. AI is still operating under a model of bicameral consciousness.


Defender أعاد

Once AI bfs/gfs become viable, real human relationships will become a status symbol. AI partners will appeal to the masses who would otherwise be stuck with a matching ugly/abusive/dull spouse. Having a flesh & blood soulmate implies that YOU have soulmate qualities yourself


Defender أعاد

A - So astrology becoming acceptable would have two needs, as I see it: 1. Someone with credibility to serve as the presenter, and 2. A need to make it easy for anyone to replicate it (like, really easy, assuming it isn't dangerous).


Defender أعاد

This is good because it’s the opposite of bureaucracy where, when something is broken and producing poor results, you pour more money and attention onto it and think that’s going to fix it.


"standard normie time"


Defender أعاد

I was a kid but I was there. I saw those stupid names get assigned. The problem was that there were hundreds of theoretical physicists trying to explain the flood of experimental data. They came up with lots of theoretical entities that all needed different names. So they had…

fucking "charm quark" "colour" for something nothing to do with colour, "bosons" sure yeah great.



is everyone following here? do you get the purpose of "anatomy of an internet argument"?

DefenderOfBasic's tweet image. is everyone following here? do you get the purpose of "anatomy of an internet argument"?

all the points you've raised against this A/B/U rating system are ones I have either (1) heard before, and resolved, or (2) have not heard before if I have heard them before, I should be able to apply the solution from last time here as well. If I fail, that reveals a novel edge…



does everyone understand that when I say "destigmatize being dumb" (science) and "destigmatize basic taste" (art) that it's exactly the same thing (accelerate growth towards truth & beauty)


do you (1) receive para social relationships OR (2) have a friend in your circle who does?


Defender أعاد

There's the causal ordering of events that is invariant (basically being formalised in chemistry in assembly theory, but more generally applicable to any informational object) That's the structure of time (like a map of all causal paths) Clock time is how often we take…


journalism is just unsolicited marketing isn't it


United States الاتجاهات

Loading...

Something went wrong.


Something went wrong.