Incomplete JS
@IncompleteJS
"The Incomplete Guide to JavaScript" (book)
You might like
I'll call this book "The Incomplete Guide to JavaScript". I'll explain JS stuff in simple terms and with simple mental models. I'll include regular caveats that these explanations are incomplete (and ultimately inaccurate) and only meant for initial learning.
Should I write an alternate (and much shorter!) version of @YDKJS that prioritizes "simple" explanations for things in JS, even if that means those explanations are not accurate? Should it just skip non-simple stuff? (or should I just leave that to many other book authors? ;)
(poll) Is it helpful/healthy/best for someone learning a new topic to learn a simplified (but ultimately inaccurate) mental model of it first, and then later (maybe!) learn additional layers that clarify/modify the mental model? Or is it better to learn accurately first?
2202 vote · Final results
United States Trends
- 1. Halloween 3.12M posts
- 2. #DoorDashTradeorTreat 2,134 posts
- 3. #sweepstakes 3,209 posts
- 4. #smackoff 2,725 posts
- 5. Cy Fair N/A
- 6. Disney 101K posts
- 7. ESPN 85K posts
- 8. Trick or Treat 453K posts
- 9. Best VP N/A
- 10. Hulu 23.9K posts
- 11. Jessica Lange 43K posts
- 12. YouTube TV 83.2K posts
- 13. Judges 96.8K posts
- 14. Billy Bob 5,932 posts
- 15. Zverev 3,734 posts
- 16. Brent Burns N/A
- 17. Candy 261K posts
- 18. #SwapSilently 8,838 posts
- 19. Medvedev 5,039 posts
- 20. #shortnspooky N/A
You might like
-
Mitul Shahriyar 🇧🇩
@mitul_shahriyar -
Leland Richardson
@intelligibabble -
Codesmith
@codesmith_ -
marais
@slightlycode -
Chris
@ChrisGannon -
Mrugesh Mohapatra 🇮🇳
@raisedadead -
Chris Wilner
@chriswilner26 -
Efi Merdler-Kravitz
@TServerless -
Fish4AI
@Fish4AI -
Josh is building AI-generated explainer videos
@JoshuaLelon -
Laura López
@lauralopvaz -
tkh
@kyehohenberger -
Saeed Esmaili
@saeedesmaili -
Marluan
@mar1uan
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.