This is not a God of the Gaps argument. It's a simple deduction. Either Life was A. Intelligently Created B. Accidentally created via unguided, mindless natural processes B is impossible. Therefore, A is true: Life was Created by an Intelligent Designer.
Atheists claim there is no evidence for God, but believe the biggest miracle of all: life came from non-life. There is zero evidence for Abiogenesis - every single hypothesis fails in the lab. There is abundant evidence for God. Life itself attests to the miracle of Creation.
A: Zero evidence for magic. B: Origin of Life is a field of science with large amounts of scientific evidence for how the building blocks of life were created and how they came together. We have several plausible pathways for how life arose. x.com/LarsTheBadMan/…
This argument commits a fundamental error: confusing the minimum requirements for a modern cell with what early life required. It's like arguing the first shelter required concrete, steel beams, and electricity because modern buildings need those things. 1/x
Quick question. Do you believe logic exists as a real and fundamental part of reality, or is it only a human invention?
Logic is an abstract concept. We discovered that's how things work. - Law of Identity - Law of Non-Contradiction - Law of the Excluded Middle All three are descriptive. Not prescriptive. Nobody "wrote a law". It's identified consistent behavior, so we call it "law".
At least you’re consistent. But the view you just described leads straight into nihilism. If logic is only a human invention, then truth and reason collapse, and no society can stand on that. It is a bleak way to see the world. Good luck living with that worldview.
I did not say logic was a human invention. I said we discovered that's how the world works. Try to keep up. Societies has stood on that since humans could form societies. Not in any way an issue for truth or reason. At times Christian reasoning is just plain stupid.
Everything is either discovered or invented. There is no third option. So the real question is whether logic exists outside the human mind. If it does not, then it is only an abstract observation by mankind. But if logic is only a human abstraction, then it is not universal, not…
I don't know how many times a month I tear that stupid cosmological argument to shreds. It's so flawed it's ridiculous. Anyone still using it should be ashamed of themselves. That's how obviously flawed it is. What version do you want me to shred first?
You cannot even get past the transcendental argument, so how would you ‘shred’ the cosmological one? The cosmological argument simply follows from the fact that logic exists outside the human mind. You have backed yourself into a corner. Either you have unknowingly accepted the…
United States الاتجاهات
- 1. Cyber Monday 39.5K posts
- 2. #Fivepillarstoken 1,533 posts
- 3. #IDontWantToOverreactBUT 1,176 posts
- 4. Alina Habba 19.1K posts
- 5. TOP CALL 11.3K posts
- 6. #MondayMotivation 9,006 posts
- 7. #GivingTuesday 2,282 posts
- 8. Shopify 3,940 posts
- 9. Mainz Biomed N/A
- 10. Check Analyze N/A
- 11. Token Signal 3,143 posts
- 12. #Rashmer 18.1K posts
- 13. Market Focus 2,616 posts
- 14. Good Monday 42K posts
- 15. Victory Monday 1,564 posts
- 16. Clarie 3,098 posts
- 17. World AIDS Day 17.3K posts
- 18. Luigi Mangione 3,771 posts
- 19. Santa V 1,132 posts
- 20. White House Christmas 13.6K posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.