Macrodispatch's profile picture. Data & Charts = Bread & Butter 

Building The Macro Puzzle Data Point by Data Point

Just following my curiosity!

Formely  Macrohive,The Macro Compass,StoneX

MacroDispatch

@Macrodispatch

Data & Charts = Bread & Butter Building The Macro Puzzle Data Point by Data Point Just following my curiosity! Formely Macrohive,The Macro Compass,StoneX

Pinned

[REPO - STIR Interactive] Ever Wondered If Everything is Okey in the repo Market? Me and @Analystlearner have done a deep dive in the and came up with a @streamlit application to monitor repo on an ongoing basis Latter will published a thread and link


MacroDispatch reposted

The graph tells us the obvious: when Repo rates are high, more collateral goes into the Standing Repo Facility . It's good to finally know that there's a "price" for the participants to submit collateral and not institutional barriers that prevent the facility from functioning

ScottSkyrm's tweet image. The graph tells us the obvious: when Repo rates are high, more collateral goes into the Standing Repo Facility . It's good to finally know that there's a "price" for the participants to submit collateral and not institutional barriers that prevent the facility from functioning

The best of the best, 10 years, wow!

Happy birthday to us



MacroDispatch reposted

The market sent $50.35 billion of securities to the SRF and $51.802 billion of cash to to the RRP Friday. Ironically, the number of securities given to the Fed about equals the amount of cash received. This was the first time the SRF functioned as designed


MacroDispatch reposted

If anything, the bid on FHLB Reserves in FED-FUNDS, finally has some movement from -7bps to -4bps Non-month-end pressure shows a slight mismatch in balance sheets due to IORB spreads; no big jump like December 2019 or the infamous 2019 + If we get to it, the Fed will intervene

Macrodispatch's tweet image. If anything, the bid on FHLB Reserves in FED-FUNDS, finally has some movement from -7bps to -4bps

Non-month-end pressure shows a slight mismatch in balance sheets due to IORB spreads; no big jump like December 2019 or the infamous 2019

+ If we get to it, the Fed will intervene
Macrodispatch's tweet image. If anything, the bid on FHLB Reserves in FED-FUNDS, finally has some movement from -7bps to -4bps

Non-month-end pressure shows a slight mismatch in balance sheets due to IORB spreads; no big jump like December 2019 or the infamous 2019

+ If we get to it, the Fed will intervene

QT is OVER, Thats the tweet!


MacroDispatch reposted

Interesting. They've announced that QT ends next month. Beginning December, they will reinvest maturing Agencies into Bills (75% in the 1-4 months bracket). This does nothing for reserves! SR-ZQ boxes should be pressured lower! This is good for repo volatility! :)

This post is unavailable.

MacroDispatch reposted

The placement of REPO GC within the target range with 25 at the top and 0 at the bottom. The "new normal" could be the top of the range, or maybe a certain amount of bps above the top where participants access the SRF. Or where cash from other markets comes into the Repo market

ScottSkyrm's tweet image. The placement of REPO GC within the target range with 25 at the top and 0 at the bottom. The "new normal" could be the top of the range, or   maybe a certain amount of bps above the top where participants access the SRF. Or where cash from other markets comes into the Repo market

Take notes, great article!

"Where does Bloomberg get this stuff??" 👇

jstatistic's tweet image. "Where does Bloomberg get this stuff??" 👇


From the same series of equations of tariff deficit math

Here's the genuine problem. There's a lot of bottom-up arguments Miran makes for r* = 0%, each a good deal outside of consensus but interesting. But there's also another thing that could make someone argue r* = 0%, as show in the algebra below. 2/2 mikekonczal.substack.com/p/mirans-case-…

mtkonczal's tweet image. Here's the genuine problem. There's a lot of bottom-up arguments Miran makes for r* = 0%, each a good deal outside of consensus but interesting.

But there's also another thing that could make someone argue r* = 0%, as show in the algebra below. 2/2
mikekonczal.substack.com/p/mirans-case-…


United States Trends

Loading...

Something went wrong.


Something went wrong.