Logic Expert Dr. Jørn Langgaard Aagesen
@ModalAxiom
In logic, there are no morals.
‘God exists’ ‘All is One’ ‘I exist beyond good and evil’ ‘Being-in-itself’ ‘That’s morally wrong/right’ ‘The Nothing nothings’ ‘Reality is prior to logic’ ‘Actualise your Will to Power’ ‘The Absolute transcends all’ ‘Is x real?’ ‘Does x actually exist?’ ‘The Good is the Truth’
The notion that Hegel’s ideas are somehow alogical is just a sociological accident since the logic of early Analytic Philosophy wasn’t sophisticated enough to fully capture the nuances of his ideas. Many modern mathematicians and logicians (including me) take Hegel seriously.
Carnap and Quine on Sense and Nonsense sshap.org/2021/11/carnap…
‘Anime girls are Nаtiоnal Sосiаlists, not Social Democrats. You’re going to lose, by the way.’
Why are you rebuking Feser (a mоng, just like you) for his belief in mystical nonsense (Hellenic metaphysics) when you also believe in mystical nonsense (‘objective moral truths’ and ‘God’)? You have neither self-awareness nor any strong arguments against Logical Positivism.
One bad side effect of the fall of logical positivism is people just started believing in magic again
You’re both pseudo-intellectual poseurs since actual Hegelians would know that they should focus more on the Science of Logic and the Encyclopaedia (which are more important than the PoS). I hate Hegel more than you frauds love him and yet I understand him better than any of you.
This is where the difference between whether a computation occurs internally or externally matters. What would you do if x isn't an external number? That would mean that ∃x Bf(x,y) may be true while there's no actual step at which the external computation finds a proof of [y].
![ModalAxiom's tweet image. This is where the difference between whether a computation occurs internally or externally matters. What would you do if x isn't an external number? That would mean that ∃x Bf(x,y) may be true while there's no actual step at which the external computation finds a proof of [y].](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GZJjwWcXcAAjOw6.jpg)
Existentialism is nothing but a pseudophilosophical enterprise that’s intrinsically averse to logic (partly because it prioritises poetisation). Bertrand Russell rightly noted here that the claims of existentialists like Heidegger simply pose as being logical and argumentative.
Given the fact that you’re brоwn (or an adorer of brоwns), it’s not really a surprise that you’re reluctant to take reason and claims of truth seriously (you do not possess any sort of intelligence). You have no actual arguments (as expected of your ilk), by the way.
"Making itself intelligible is suicide for philosophy."
Of course your flag represents slаvе morality. You will never be independent from us, by the way.
"Making itself intelligible is suicide for philosophy."
It’s the same old cope. ‘Uh, you don’t get it! It’s a profound existential insight. You’re focusing too much on the sentence itself.’ They desperately try to justify their meaningless metaphysical gibberish that attempts to go beyond the expressive capabilities of language.
Despite what Xitter wignats would tell you, having a loli fetish isn't le "Aryan". Its more spiritually LatinX, GooX, & dare I say tr00n than Aryan.
Logical Positivism Rudolf Carnap believed that the race with the most positive qualities is the most logical race. This philosophy is known as logical positivism.
UK agrees to give up sovereignty of remote Chagos Islands to Mauritius, in historic deal over one of its last overseas territories bbc.in/4eN2Mm5
‘Have you forgotten that it’s impossible to understand meaningless nonsense?’
One of the main challenges of doing philosophy is trying to discuss a single topic for a long enough time to actually have substantial knowledge about that topic while also trying to avoid accidentally entangling yourself in numerous other ongoing debates. Always manoeuvre well!
‘“Reality” is a meaningless term, though.’
I’m rather certain that the issue that has been raised here could be circumvented if we just reformulate (2) as such: one is justified in believing that (E → P) independently of having epistemic access to the truth values of both E and P.
United States Trends
- 1. Good Saturday 17.2K posts
- 2. #LingOrm1st_ImpactFANCON 1.13M posts
- 3. Talus Labs 25.3K posts
- 4. #KirbyAirRiders 2,050 posts
- 5. Frankenstein 85.6K posts
- 6. taylor york 9,514 posts
- 7. Brown Jackson 6,111 posts
- 8. #River 4,848 posts
- 9. Giulia 16.2K posts
- 10. Tulane 4,567 posts
- 11. The Supreme Court 149K posts
- 12. Justice Jackson 6,515 posts
- 13. Aaron Gordon 5,896 posts
- 14. Pluribus 31.9K posts
- 15. Collar 17.3K posts
- 16. Russ 14.7K posts
- 17. Tatis 2,327 posts
- 18. Connor Bedard 3,390 posts
- 19. #TheFutureIsTeal N/A
- 20. Westbrook 7,358 posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.