Modern SQL
@ModernSQL
Still using Windows 3.1? So why stick to SQL-92? A lot has changed in 30 years. We embrace the standard.
You might like
There was a problem, please refresh the page and try again.
United States Trends
- 1. #SmackDown 32K posts
- 2. Tulane 10.3K posts
- 3. Gunther 20.2K posts
- 4. North Texas 6,887 posts
- 5. #ROHFinalBattle 15.4K posts
- 6. #OPLive 2,556 posts
- 7. LA Knight 10.2K posts
- 8. Anthony Davis 1,701 posts
- 9. Cocona 30.4K posts
- 10. #TNAFinalResolution 5,846 posts
- 11. Kennesaw State 3,477 posts
- 12. UNLV 3,663 posts
- 13. Boise State 2,620 posts
- 14. Mark Pope 3,131 posts
- 15. Athena 9,388 posts
- 16. #OPNation 1,030 posts
- 17. Trouba N/A
- 18. Persephone 2,498 posts
- 19. Wes Miller N/A
- 20. Jimmy Rogers 2,431 posts
You might like
-
PostgreSQL
@PostgreSQL -
Markus Winand
@MarkusWinand -
SQL Performance Tips
@SQLPerfTips -
SQL Daily
@sqldaily -
Planet PostgreSQL
@planetpostgres -
MySQL
@MySQL -
DB-Engines
@DBEngines -
PostgresConf
@postgresconf -
Microsoft SQL Server
@SQLServer -
SQLServerGeeks.com
@SQLServerGeeks -
MySQL Community Team
@mysql_community -
EDB
@EDBPostgres -
Crunchy Data
@crunchydata -
SQLMaestros
@SQLMaestros -
PostgresWorld
@PostgresWorld
Loading...
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.