#timeinarchaeology #ch1 #Smith 92: #Annales reduces to events. #Lucas 05: events show up in single arts & feats. But assemblages?
#timeinarchaeology #ch1 For #Dunnell, materialism offers only hope for evol. arch., things are always in state of becoming
#timeinarchaeology #ch1 #Stern approach aligns with #geoarch ala #DeBoer 83, #Stein 87, #Dunnell 1992 Artefacts as particles in sediment
#timeinarchaeology #ch1 #timeaveraging is not behaviour averaging, but summation of variety of behaviours
#timeinarchaeology #ch1 #Stern 93, 94 articulates deposition, #timeaveraging, & #tp, per Binford's "hist. integrity" Lifeways don't work.
#timeinarchaeology #ch1 "Place Use histories" #Camilli 83, 88, #Sullivan 1992, #Wandsnider 1998) #DewarMcBride 1992 #Kelly 1998
#timeinarchaeology #ch1 #tp Extends to landscape perspective via Binford (arch of place) and Foley (Off-site arch). "Place use histories"
#timeinarchaeology #ch1 "Taphonomic metaphysic": after #Schiffer, study of archaeological record itself to access temp properties
#timeinarchaeology #ch1 Synch/func interpretations don't address record as medium through which explanation is developed
#timeinarchaeology #ch1 Paynter (2002) New arch quickly descended into synchronic, functional interpretation jstor.org/stable/3596513
#timeinarchaeology #ch1 pg3 Issue with "strategies" as temporally static signatures: "proximate, functional, timeless"
#timeinarchaeology #ch1 #mythoughts #tp supposes repeated record is repeat events: how much repeated?
#timeinarchaeology #ch1 #tp ideas developed by #Bailey, #Binford, and #Foley See also #Lucas #2012 #archrecord
#timeinarchaeology #ch1 #tp observations made at different timescales make different processes apparent (alt. to the degenerative view)
#timeinarchaeology #ch1 Aim of book is to show identified probs have not gone away, and illustrate methods that can be applied
#timeinarchaeology #ch1 Both Bailey and Binford failed to provide programmatic statements that inspired a new body of research.
#timeinarchaeology #ch1 pg2 "Archaeological explanation is often treated as just another form of social explanation.."
2 of 2 our explanations are derived from the archaeological record." Arch has focused on social: how much does this engage the arch record?
#timeinarchaeology #ch1 pg2 1 of 1 "If archaeological explanations are to be taken seriously.. then we need to be clear how
United States Trends
- 1. #SurvivorSeries 114K posts
- 2. Auburn 19.4K posts
- 3. Liv Morgan 25.2K posts
- 4. Vandy 15.8K posts
- 5. John Cena 28.8K posts
- 6. Bama 18.4K posts
- 7. Nikki 33.2K posts
- 8. Ty Simpson 1,929 posts
- 9. Roxanne 6,106 posts
- 10. Oklahoma 32.4K posts
- 11. Norvell 5,245 posts
- 12. Lash Legend 6,868 posts
- 13. Rhea 19.6K posts
- 14. Stephanie Vaquer 7,171 posts
- 15. Heupel 3,266 posts
- 16. Mateer 8,041 posts
- 17. Dirty Dom 1,413 posts
- 18. #RollTide 2,287 posts
- 19. Tim Banks 3,242 posts
- 20. Tennessee 44.6K posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.