The Dark Fiddling Pirate Jussim
@PsychRabble
Academic piracy here. Social science: http://sites.rutgers.edu/lee-jussim/ Substack: http://unsafescience.substack.com Nothing here represents Rutgers.
Bạn có thể thích
"the biggest benefit of a paid subscription is that you [help]...resist the extremist turn of academia and maintain islands of integrity in a sea of academic political corruption." How? I've dedicated the $ to projects, not my pockets. unsafescience.substack.com/p/paid-subscri…
1. Exactly. 2. There is a whole cottage industry of papers claiming that "denial" of biases against women is itself sexist. But if most of the evidence fails to find biases against women in hiring what is the nonsexist conclusion?
"Academics and journalists shine a spotlight on studies that appear to show bias against women, while downplaying - or simply ignoring - studies that don’t. The result is a distorted view of what the science actually shows." [Link below.]
![SteveStuWill's tweet image. "Academics and journalists shine a spotlight on studies that appear to show bias against women, while downplaying - or simply ignoring - studies that don’t. The result is a distorted view of what the science actually shows."
[Link below.]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G5_SgZVbAAAywst.jpg)
Postdoc to study the psych of antisemitism with some pretty accomplished folks (who have not been caught up in the replication crisis). But the hanging q is: Where in academia can you get a job if your main focus is on antisemitism?
Postdoc to study the Psychology of Antisemitism, with the great @michael_barlev and Steve Neuberg apply.interfolio.com/177756. Apply by 12/17/2025
Interesting thread. Apparently, I am more vocal about, rather than actually deviant in, my skeptical takes on psychology. (I also agree with the perception that things are slowly improving).
At Transparent Replications, we ran a survey of 210 academic psychologists to understand what they believe about the reliability of their own field, and our results are remarkable. For instance, we asked them to what extent they trust papers in top psychology journals: 🧵
Indeed. But its not likely to happen by bureaucrats spontaneously seeing the error of the ways. Not in the article, but, afaict, it will take either a strong U admin (Pres, VP Research, etc.) or govt action (HHS could require a more limited IRB & most U's go by HHS rules) or…
Many of us have observed over the years the increased power and bureaucracy associated with university Institutional Review Boards (IRBs). In this article, @slsatel, @PsychRabble, and colleagues offer a plan to get IRBs back under control.
Heh, here's hoping even you can see how this is very amusing (both the shot, the first tweet shown here, on its absurd demerits) and, the chaser, its juxtaposition with the second, linked. x.com/BrandonWarmke/…
According to Jason Stanley, if you're "talking about polarization" you're just a fascism enabler. In fact, you're "almost worse than the fascists." If he hadn't already emptied the term of any substantive content, this should do it.
Newest post liked in quoted tweet. On my department's recent decision to publicly endorse academic freedom.
"I do not care whether the motivations for the statement are good or bad and neither should you. The statement is, in my view, excellent on its merits." unsafescience.substack.com/p/fear-equity-…
New Post. The story of how my department, RU/Psychology, came to publicly proclaim its support for academic freedom. Link in reply/.
Tennis.
"between 1965 and 1995, the typical adult gained 6 hours a week in leisure time...they could have used those additional 300 hours a year to learn a new skill...Instead, the typical American funneled almost all of this extra time into watching more TV." derekthompson.org/p/why-everythi…
Totally agree. Nothing wrong with small studies if they are interpreted appropriately, usually meaning as including great uncertainty, NOT establishing some new discovery, and as preliminary requiring confirmation by larger studies conducted by independent teams, preferably via…
New 'Preliminary Report' submission format at Science and Medicine in Football. An idea that should be interesting for other journals! Explicitly make space for honestly reported smaller sample-size studies tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
Heard backyard birds, via Merlin app. 7am today. Never even heard of the Junco before this.
Real (not beer commercial) Clydesdale, Hunterdon, NJ
Damn. In 1915! the (then functional) @AAUP actually all-but predicted exactly what has happened: "If this profession should prove itself unwilling to purge its ranks of the incompetent and the unworthy, or to prevent the freedom which it claims in the name of science from being…
![rickstem's profile picture. [reluctant]“future politician with firm convictions…a quiet man except when arguing”(High School YB). “Homeless Liberal”. Dog lover. Software developer.](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1729581753579220992/vvC1vuW7.jpg)
United States Xu hướng
- 1. #DWTS 49.1K posts
- 2. Whitney 14.9K posts
- 3. Keyonte George 1,540 posts
- 4. Elaine 16.9K posts
- 5. LeBron 51.5K posts
- 6. Taylor Ward 2,989 posts
- 7. Dylan 24K posts
- 8. Grayson 6,315 posts
- 9. Orioles 5,996 posts
- 10. #WWENXT 15.5K posts
- 11. Winthrop 2,314 posts
- 12. Jordan 107K posts
- 13. Harrison Barnes 1,953 posts
- 14. Peggy 15.6K posts
- 15. Robert 82.3K posts
- 16. Connor Bedard 3,422 posts
- 17. Haiti 47.9K posts
- 18. Tatum 13.7K posts
- 19. Angels 30.8K posts
- 20. Romanov 1,385 posts
Bạn có thể thích
-
Jonathan Haidt
@JonHaidt -
Charles Murray
@charlesmurray -
John McWhorter
@JohnHMcWhorter -
Rolf Degen
@DegenRolf -
Bo Winegard
@EPoe187 -
Claire Lehmann
@clairlemon -
Steve Stewart-Williams
@SteveStuWill -
Greg Lukianoff
@glukianoff -
Diana S. Fleischman
@sentientist -
Quillette
@Quillette -
Christina Hoff Sommers
@CHSommers -
Heterodox Academy
@HdxAcademy -
Sarah Haider 👾
@SarahTheHaider -
Yoel Inbar
@yorl -
Rob Henderson
@robkhenderson
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.