Comment below the output! 😃👇

Python_Dv's tweet image. Comment below the output! 😃👇

Both reverse the string the same way. Slice gives ‘nohtyP’, reversed() + join gives ‘nohtyP’ too. So it prints True.


Answer: (A) True The code defines s1 as the string "Python". s2 = s1[::-1] uses Python's slicing syntax to reverse the string s1, resulting in the value "nohtyP". s3 = "".join(reversed(s1)) uses the reversed() function to iterate over the characters of s1 in reverse


🚀 Say hello to Matt Pocock at JSNation! Independent TypeScript educator and builder of awesome self-paced courses at Total TypeScript.


@grok whats the output?


True, Because both S1


A)True both s2 and s3 are reversed of s1


A) True. Both s2 and s3 are reversed of s1.


Top engineers. Modern React. Two days in Paris. React Paris 2026 lineup is LIVE.


Both s2 and s3 are created with different ways of reversing strings. But result is same. SO it will orint true.


True. s2 and s3 produce the exact same result s1, but reversed. The final query performs a boolean equality check on two identical values; therefore, the result is True


True ✅ Because both of them are reversing s1


True .join () returns same result


Actually, s2 is more straightforward and requires less kernel overhead. It would be even more efficient to avoid storing it in a variable and instead generate the query only when needed


United States トレンド
Loading...

Something went wrong.


Something went wrong.