RNA
@RNA_IP
RNA, Technology and IP Attorneys - A Leading Intellectual Property Law Firm in India - Patent, Design, Copyright, Trademark, Enforcement, IP Investigation
You might like
Grateful for 2025! Energised for what’s ahead. As we close another remarkable year at RNA, Technology and IP Attorneys, we find ourselves reflecting on what truly made 2025 extraordinary – our people and the culture we nurture together. #YearEnd #Milestone #Celebration #ProBono
As the year draws to a close, we extend our warmest Christmas wishes to our clients, colleagues, and associates. Thank you for your continued trust and collaboration throughout the year. We look forward to a New Year filled with growth and stronger partnerships. #merrychristmas
The Delhi High Court’s ruling in the GULSHAN-E-KARIM dispute offers a nuanced take on trademark enforcement in the restaurant space. Authors: Mohandas Konnanath lexology.com/library/detail… #delhihighcourt #trademark #commercial #ipr #rnaip
The Karnataka High Court’s Division Bench decision in the YEZDI trademark dispute revisits a classic question in IP and insolvency law. Authors: Ranjan Narula and Mohandas Konnanath lexology.com/library/detail… #karnatakahighcourt #trademark #ipr #motorcycle #rnaip
The Bombay High Court has affirmed that a company’s corporate name cannot be used as a shield to justify trademark infringement. Authors: Mohandas Konnanath lexology.com/library/detail… #highcourt #intellectualproperty #rnaip
We are honoured to share some exciting news! Our firm has been recognised as “Intellectual Property Law Firm of the Year” at the BW Legal World Global Legal Leaders Awards 2025. A heartfelt thank you to BW Legal World for this recognition, to our team. #Gratitude #BWLegalWorld
The Division bench of the Delhi High Court has delivered a decisive ruling in favour of Mankind Pharma, holding that Brinton’s mark ACNESCAR is deceptively similar to the registered mark ACNESTAR. Authors: Ranjan Narula and Mohandas Konnanath lexology.com/library/detail… #rnaip
The Bombay High Court’s ruling in the “DOCTOR EXTRA SOFT” case reaffirms that equity and concealment cannot coexist, any injunction obtained through suppression of facts is destined to be struck down. Author: Mohandas Konnanath lnkd.in/gpusQdBZ
The Bombay High Court’s ruling in the “DOCTOR EXTRA SOFT” case reaffirms that equity and concealment cannot coexist, any injunction obtained through suppression of facts is destined to be struck down. Author: Mohandas Konnanath lexology.com/library/detail…
The judgment lays down an important principle, trademark protection extends beyond the exact words or visuals to the distinctive idea or concept behind the mark. Author: Ranjan Narula rnaip.com/wow-momo-wins-… lexology.com/library/detail… #delhihighcourt #trademark #ipr #rnaip
In the complex world of Standard Essential Patent (SEP) disputes, especially those involving FRAND (Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory) terms, the role of confidentiality clubs has become indispensable. Authors: Ranjan Narula and Rachna Bakhru lexology.com/library/detail…
In a recent ruling on transnational trademark protection, the Delhi High Court’s Division Bench considered the principles of territoriality and goodwill. Authors: Ranjan Narula and Mohandas Konnanath lexology.com/library/detail…
The Delhi High Court held that right to cross-examination, though fundamental, is not absolute, it must be exercised diligently and at the appropriate stage. Author: Ranjan Narula lexology.com/library/detail… #NaturalJustice #CrossExamination #PatentLitigation #IPLaw
From all of us at RRNA IP, we send heartfelt greetings for a bright and prosperous Diwali. A season of reflection, rejuvenation, and profound joy. May the radiance of the lamps illuminate your lives, bringing the deepest form of happiness and abundant success. #HappyDiwali2025
he Delhi High Court, in Tablets India Ltd v. Spey Medicals Pvt Ltd, underscored that strict adherence to procedural timelines is vital in trademark opposition proceedings. Authors: Ranjan Narula and Mohandas Konnanath lexology.com/library/detail… #delhihighcourt #trademark #ipr
The Madras High Court recently dealt with a unique dispute involving claims of trademark and copyright infringement over the design of a flag. Author: Mohandas Konnanath lexology.com/library/detail… #madrashighcourt #trademark #intellectualproperty #infringement #ipr #rnaip
The Delhi High Court, in a recent order, declined to restrain Wow Burger from using its mark despite objections by Wow Momo Foods. Authors: Ranjan Narula and Mohandas Konnanath lexology.com/library/detail… #delhihighcourt #intellectualproperty #trademark #ipr #rnaip
Atomberg Technologies’ appeal against Luker Electric over its Renesa ceiling fan design has been dismissed by the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court. Author: Mohandas Konnanath lexology.com/library/detail… #trademark #ipr #infringement #intellectualproperty #rnaip
The Madras High Court recently considered the scope of Section 3(d) and Section 3(e) in a patent appeal (CMA (PT) No.28 of 2023) filed by Amgen Inc. against a pre-grant refusal of their application. Authors: Ranjan Narula and Suvarna Pandey lnkd.in/gTZuq7cT #patent
The Delhi High Court recently weighed in on a trademark clash between Cordelia Cruises and Cordelia Inn, examining whether the shared use of “Cordelia” in the hospitality sector could cause customer confusion. Authors: Mohandas Konnanath lexology.com/library/detail…
United States Trends
- 1. FINALLY DID IT 563 B posts
- 2. The BONK 189 B posts
- 3. Cam Coleman 4.135 posts
- 4. Auburn 7.236 posts
- 5. Jacksepticeye 4.792 posts
- 6. Puka 7.345 posts
- 7. Bijan 5.492 posts
- 8. Butter Curve N/A
- 9. Netanyahu 197 B posts
- 10. Lincoln Riley 1.184 posts
- 11. Pitts 2.374 posts
- 12. App State 1.418 posts
- 13. Team Jordan 2.525 posts
- 14. The BULLISH 320 B posts
- 15. Stafford 13,1 B posts
- 16. Chappell 10,3 B posts
- 17. Trae 18,5 B posts
- 18. The WHITEWHALE 15,4 B posts
- 19. Golesh N/A
- 20. #quest 5.582 posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.