1/7 ⚛️ Level 1: Simple & straightforward grouping by file types. Good for small to medium projects, but maintenance can be a headache as the project grows. #React #FolderStructure
2/7 ⚛️ Level 2: Grouping by file types and features. Provides better organization, making it easier to locate and manage related code. Ideal for medium to large projects. #React #FolderStructure
3/7 ⚛️ Level 3: Highly modular approach, grouping by features/modules. Offers clear boundaries and scalability for large and complex projects. Requires good understanding of business logic. #React #FolderStructure
4/7 Give Consistent Meanings to Folder Names: UI Components React Specific Utilities & External Integrations Business Logic Styles TypeScript and Configurations Server Communication State Management Routing Testing
5/7 Conclusion: Choose the right folder structure based on project size and complexity. While Level 1 may suffice for small projects, Level 2 and Level 3 offer more organization and scalability. Consistent folder naming fosters intuitive architecture. #React #FolderStructure
6/7 Folder Structures in React Projects: Level 1: Simple & straightforward Level 2: Grouping by file types and features Level 3: Grouping by features/modules
7/7 Whether you're starting a new React project or improving an existing one, thoughtful folder structuring can greatly impact maintainability and scalability. Choose wisely! #React #FolderStructure #WebDev 🚀
United States トレンド
- 1. Godzilla 23.9K posts
- 2. Lamine 63.2K posts
- 3. Barca 96.4K posts
- 4. Trench 7,341 posts
- 5. Brujas 25.3K posts
- 6. Shabbat 2,556 posts
- 7. $DUOL 2,414 posts
- 8. Brugge 46.9K posts
- 9. Barcelona 149K posts
- 10. Foden 21.1K posts
- 11. Flick 36.9K posts
- 12. Richardson 3,337 posts
- 13. Frey 27.5K posts
- 14. #dispatch 38.3K posts
- 15. Captain Kangaroo N/A
- 16. Jared Golden 1,920 posts
- 17. Balde 12.8K posts
- 18. Minneapolis 59.9K posts
- 19. Anthony Taylor 1,778 posts
- 20. SCOTUS 35.4K posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.