csabapalfi's profile picture.

Csaba Palfi

@csabapalfi

Csaba Palfi reposted

Fired up for our new careers page going live today! 🔥 artillery.io/careers We are looking for four new teammates to build the future of production engineering together.


Csaba Palfi reposted

Interested in topics relating to product analytics, data and business experimentation? Over the next 30 days, I'm writing 30 Atomic Essays as a part of @dickiebush and @Nicolascole77's Ship 30 for 30. Follow my Social Blog on @typeshare_co 👇 typeshare.co/tristanburns


Csaba Palfi reposted

Ideation: Finding a good business idea. We all know how frustrating it is to start working on an idea to later find that... it wasn't that great after all... What makes for a good idea? How do you find one? carlosbaraza.com/ideation-findi…


Csaba Palfi reposted

📊 We analyzed Core Web Vitals based on domain popularity. Here're the findings: • LCP is awesome – popular websites have better LCP • FID is irrelevant – 99% of desktop sessions are good • CLS is problematic – poor CLS is the reason sites don't pass CWV #webperf Thread ⤵

__treo's tweet image. 📊 We analyzed Core Web Vitals based on domain popularity. 

Here're the findings:
• LCP is awesome – popular websites have better LCP
• FID is irrelevant – 99% of desktop sessions are good
• CLS is problematic – poor CLS is the reason sites don't pass CWV #webperf

Thread ⤵
__treo's tweet image. 📊 We analyzed Core Web Vitals based on domain popularity. 

Here're the findings:
• LCP is awesome – popular websites have better LCP
• FID is irrelevant – 99% of desktop sessions are good
• CLS is problematic – poor CLS is the reason sites don't pass CWV #webperf

Thread ⤵
__treo's tweet image. 📊 We analyzed Core Web Vitals based on domain popularity. 

Here're the findings:
• LCP is awesome – popular websites have better LCP
• FID is irrelevant – 99% of desktop sessions are good
• CLS is problematic – poor CLS is the reason sites don't pass CWV #webperf

Thread ⤵
__treo's tweet image. 📊 We analyzed Core Web Vitals based on domain popularity. 

Here're the findings:
• LCP is awesome – popular websites have better LCP
• FID is irrelevant – 99% of desktop sessions are good
• CLS is problematic – poor CLS is the reason sites don't pass CWV #webperf

Thread ⤵

I can see @__treo Sites showing 'Related Pages'. Do you maybe have any plans to show a report/chart with historical field data for Pages?


Looking at PageSpeed Insights data in @__treo and it can't all be from PSI API call result. It seems to give back too much data (e.g. SEO, etc audits) so I assume the config nicely matches PSI but it's still a 'local' Lighthouse run. Is that correct?


Csaba Palfi reposted

I just learned about the CLI tool `grex`. It might change how I approach regular expressions (🤞🙈). You provide string values and it comes up with a regular expression matching them.😲 github.com/pemistahl/grex Video alt: CLI session showing multiple generated reg. expressions.


#!/usr/bin/env node // ./psi.min.js [url] const https = require("https"); const b = "googleapis.com/pagespeedonlin…"; const q = new URLSearchParams({url: process.argv[2], strategy: "mobile", key: process.env.KEY }); https.get(`${b}/?${q.toString()}`, (r) => r.pipe(process.stdout));


Loading...

Something went wrong.


Something went wrong.