educated_frog's profile picture. Resurrected from the dead to debunk retards and liars.

Junkirk Futureuta

@educated_frog

Resurrected from the dead to debunk retards and liars.

Junkirk Futureuta reposted
TheSkeptic4122's tweet image.

Special pleading fallacy, you’re making an arbitrary exception with no evidence for your sky daddy. “God exists but he never began” this probably goes hard if you’re a retard.

Anything that began must have a cause. God never began. He always is. Therefore, He doesn’t require a cause. Why can’t atheists understand this?



Junkirk Futureuta reposted

Your “evidence” is always one step away from “trust me, it’s in a book” the moment we ask for something testable.

So true😂😂

erichovind's tweet image. So true😂😂


Junkirk Futureuta reposted

Totally false. Several materials help to date: cristall Zircon with both Uranium 238 and 235 show millions of years among sediments Never ever a primate with a dinosaur in the same epoch. Liers.

fabvillac100's tweet image. Totally false. 
Several materials help to date: cristall Zircon with both Uranium 238 and 235 show millions of years among sediments 
Never ever a primate with a dinosaur in the same epoch.
Liers.

No because the fossil record contradicts the biblical timeline.

If there really was a global flood, like the Bible says, we should find billions of dead things, buried in rock layers, laid down by water, all over the Earth. And that’s exactly what we find!

NotEvolution1's tweet image. If there really was a global flood, like the Bible says, we should find billions of dead things, buried in rock layers, laid down by water, all over the Earth. And that’s exactly what we find!


Tacit admission that god only exists as a character in the Bible and is not objective truth.

🤣🤣🤣 "There is no Bill of Rights." Prove me wrong without using the Constitution. Clown world.



Nope. Your prime mover is based on a Jewish storm god, in other words, an invisible man in the sky.

Most people can recognize that the Prime Mover (not an invisible man in the sky) exists simply by experiencing the things that depend in Him. That’s part of intelligence.



None of those people proved the existence of god. They only made arguments which bolster their pre existing beliefs. If god was objectively true then there would be no arguments for god.

-“You can’t prove God” The smartest people in history have built airtight cases for God’s existence using logic, mathematics, history, and fulfilled prophecy. -“Muh science” Modern science itself is a direct result of Christianity. I have midwit fatigue…

CathTeto's tweet image. -“You can’t prove God”
The smartest people in history have built airtight cases for God’s existence using logic, mathematics, history, and fulfilled prophecy.

-“Muh science”
Modern science itself is a direct result of Christianity.

I have midwit fatigue…


There is no evidence of god, only arguments.

Can you imagine?



God never revealed himself at all, that’s your belief. That’s not the truth. God is man made.

It’s crap because it is not itself scientific… It’s conjecture and question begging. Ricky begs the question by assuming no religion is true. But if a religion was true, then why wouldn’t God reveal himself to us again in the same manner he already has? Also, what evidence…



“Everything needs a creator except for god”

1. All contingent things require explanation in terms of something outside of themselves. 2. The universe is a contingent thing (and is the set of all contingent things). So, 3. A necessary being must explain the universe. 4. A necessary being would be perfect. So, 5. God exists



No because if objective morality exists then god cannot be morally justified for his actions. Objective morality means independent of a mind, if you argue that morality is dependent on gods mind, then it is by definition subjective morality.

I’ll help you out—he’s absolutely right. If there is no God there is no right or wrong, there is no objective standard above us, there is no free will, there is no human value, and your opinion (what you likey) is no more valid than what a pedophile “likeys.” Without God…



Arguments are not evidence. Arguments cannot conclusively prove anything, they only bolster pre existing beliefs. The fact that you think googling arguments is sufficient evidence to prove the existence of god as objective truth is retarded.

Unless you have studied, at minimum, all of the standard attempts to prove God's existence, you shouldn't be claiming there are no proofs for the existence of God.



Junkirk Futureuta reposted

So lets cover the facts: -She illegally entered his home. -He was passed out drunk and couldn't respond. -She took a picture/video of his naked body. -She put on the internet. All she had to do was leave the food and go, imagine if the genders were reversed, she's not a victim.

DoorDash delivery girl has been arrested on 2 felony charges after recording a man passed out with his pants down in his home and posting it on TikTok during a food delivery. She is being charged with unlawful surveillance and dissemination of surveillance images

FearedBuck's tweet image. DoorDash delivery girl has been arrested on 2 felony charges after recording a man passed out with his pants down in his home and posting it on TikTok during a food delivery. 

She is being charged with unlawful surveillance and dissemination of surveillance images
FearedBuck's tweet image. DoorDash delivery girl has been arrested on 2 felony charges after recording a man passed out with his pants down in his home and posting it on TikTok during a food delivery. 

She is being charged with unlawful surveillance and dissemination of surveillance images


The Rational Argument for Thor Premise 1: if lightning and thunder exists, then Thor must exist. Premise 2: lightning and thunder exists. Conclusion: therefore Thor exists.

𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐑𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐀𝐋 𝐀𝐑𝐆𝐔𝐌𝐄𝐍𝐓 𝐅𝐎𝐑 𝐆𝐎𝐃 𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐞 𝟏: If the property of rationality exists, then God must exist. 𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐞 𝟐: The property of rationality exists. 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐥𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧: Therefore, God exists.

darwintojesus's tweet image. 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐑𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐀𝐋 𝐀𝐑𝐆𝐔𝐌𝐄𝐍𝐓 𝐅𝐎𝐑 𝐆𝐎𝐃

𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐞 𝟏: If the property of rationality exists, then God must exist.
𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐞 𝟐: The property of rationality exists.
𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐥𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧: Therefore, God exists.


Not the same thing. You can presuppose the existence of a clockmaker because we have empirical evidence that people make clocks. That reasoning does not apply to the universe.

There is a Maker.

darwintojesus's tweet image. There is a Maker.


If objective values exist then god cannot be morally just.

Without God there are no objective values like “bad.” Without God there is what is, that is all. Things appear to happen, we describe them. There are no values. There is no Telos. No goal. No design. There is no meaning. People ask me, “well as an atheist did you not see reasons…

darwintojesus's tweet image. Without God there are no objective values like “bad.” Without God there is what is, that is all. Things appear to happen, we describe them. There are no values. There is no Telos. No goal. No design. There is no meaning.

People ask me, “well as an atheist did you not see reasons…


Arguments are not evidence.

The hubris of "atheists" who never bothered to actually understand the arguments of Christianity are always such a let down, but what is more of a let down, is that countless numbers of mindless dopemine chasers will find this to be intellectually satisfying. "Ever since the…



Presupposing atheists lost while not being able to prove the existence of god is rich.

Ricky is stuck in the “new atheist” phase and hasn’t learned that we completely wrecked this version of atheists a while ago. It’s like the guy who thinks the war is still going on and everybody has to tell em “it’s over mate, we lost. “



You can actually. Because arguments are not evidence.

When theists present proofs for God’s existence, though, you can’t just cross your arms and say “I don’t believe you.” You ultimately have to make metaphysical claims.



Loading...

Something went wrong.


Something went wrong.