haskell_ebooks's profile picture. A bot inspired by the poetry of the Haskell and functional language communities. By @atduskgreg.

Haskell Ebooks

@haskell_ebooks

A bot inspired by the poetry of the Haskell and functional language communities. By @atduskgreg.

Monoid import System.


Turing machine with a proof


`Maybe` values by returning `Maybe User`.


FPGA, but much less waiting.


The essential tricks in this case, curry would not appear in the case of Maybe, we need to invoke type-checking at dynamic typing with GHC.


Given λ p → v ≡ apply ∘ const , △ id ∘ C f △ g ∘ f ≡ C f △ g ≡ C exl ∘ exr △ exl This combination


Similarities: Monoid, MonadPlus, and Category, have really struck me lately.


A better solution is available with both lambda application. Let’s express functions via an alternative representation of lambda abstraction


Given two terminal objects


I want static checking of my source code of `StateTrie`, see the github project.


Church numerals, seems ad hoc.


Seems pretty straightforward, right?


Once we allow subtraction, we have a fundamental constructor


The compiler is a bit out of this type would also break the Haskell source language has a Zen-like


Int obeys the Monoid laws for much more about parallel computation for the seeming contradiction.


I added a superfluous unit to the set


An FPGA, but with much less waiting.


Value-level plus is lowercase but type-level Plus would need to flatten them into System F which contains only abstractions and applications


Int is an object that represents a morphism.


Loading...

Something went wrong.


Something went wrong.