tezancsgo's profile picture. BA in Economics & MSc in Applied Economics. CS lover and nerd. Wanting to start doing some content. Spanish & english speaker. 🇨🇱 living in 🇦🇺

tezan

@tezancsgo

BA in Economics & MSc in Applied Economics. CS lover and nerd. Wanting to start doing some content. Spanish & english speaker. 🇨🇱 living in 🇦🇺

ปักหมุด

🧵 Are BO1s really more random than BO3s? 1/ I analyzed all matches from the last 2 CS Majors (RMRs to the final) to see if BO1s are truly more random. The data didn’t match the common belief. Surprisingly, it seems that BO1s aren’t more random than BO3s. Here’s what I found 👇

tezancsgo's tweet image. 🧵 Are BO1s really more random than BO3s?

1/ I analyzed all matches from the last 2 CS Majors (RMRs to the final) to see if BO1s are truly more random. The data didn’t match the common belief. Surprisingly, it seems that BO1s aren’t more random than BO3s. Here’s what I found 👇

tezan รีโพสต์แล้ว

The switch from RMR to MRQ and the move to online qualifiers hit viewership hard compared to the previous RMR (-68%) 📉 - Peak viewership for BLAST Austin Major MRQ: 169,974 - Peak viewership for Shanghai RMR: 531,955 (data via: @EsportsCharts)

TheCSTimes's tweet image. The switch from RMR to MRQ and the move to online qualifiers hit viewership hard compared to the previous RMR (-68%) 📉

- Peak viewership for BLAST Austin Major MRQ: 169,974
- Peak viewership for Shanghai RMR: 531,955

(data via: @EsportsCharts)
TheCSTimes's tweet image. The switch from RMR to MRQ and the move to online qualifiers hit viewership hard compared to the previous RMR (-68%) 📉

- Peak viewership for BLAST Austin Major MRQ: 169,974
- Peak viewership for Shanghai RMR: 531,955

(data via: @EsportsCharts)

tezan รีโพสต์แล้ว

Scoop: The market for Counter-Strike 2 skins hit an all-time high today at $4.3 billion--amid concerns around the S&P 500 and cryptocurrencies. Data via @pricempire bloomberg.com/news/articles/…

cecianasta's tweet image. Scoop: The market for Counter-Strike 2 skins hit an all-time high today at $4.3 billion--amid concerns around the S&P 500 and cryptocurrencies. Data via @pricempire  bloomberg.com/news/articles/…

tezan รีโพสต์แล้ว

I love how spirit and Navi are friends out of the server but some navi's fans and others love to propagandize everything between them unfortunately


tezan รีโพสต์แล้ว

Researchers challenged longhorn crazy ants and humans with the same task: maneuvering a T-shaped object through two consecutive open doorways. Single humans always outperformed single ants, but ant groups could beat human groups. In PNAS: ow.ly/5vat50UwZAo

PNASNews's tweet image. Researchers challenged longhorn crazy ants and humans with the same task: maneuvering a T-shaped object through two consecutive open doorways. Single humans always outperformed single ants, but ant groups could beat human groups. In PNAS: ow.ly/5vat50UwZAo

The Snax's clutch is what I call beautiful CS


tezan รีโพสต์แล้ว

American Economic Review is excellent under the current Board. Let me give you five papers (not exclusive!) that are super interesting in the new issue. 1/6


tezan รีโพสต์แล้ว

Female content creators on YouTube received significantly more negative feedback for comparable content. But the removal of public display of dislikes eliminated this gender gap and persistently increased female creator productivity and consumer demand.

florianederer's tweet image. Female content creators on YouTube received significantly more negative feedback for comparable content. 

But the removal of public display of dislikes eliminated this gender gap and persistently increased female creator productivity and consumer demand.

tezan รีโพสต์แล้ว

Bro was going to fistbump the cameraman 😅


tezan รีโพสต์แล้ว

I've seen a lot of people costreaming RMR and as I'm trying to get more involved with social media. I want to ask if any of you doing this need a volunteer to talk about data/statistic during the stream, I have good knowledge of SA teams and good EU level 2. RT's are appreciated.


United States เทรนด์

Loading...

Something went wrong.


Something went wrong.