#feudalhierarchy search results

People have this strange idea that people under feudalism lived in some sort of abject tyranny. Of course they didn't. Even serfs had established rights alongside their duties, and lords (whether they were knights or monks) had moral and economic reasons to maintain a balance of…

read Kingship and Law by Fritz Kern and Fiefs and Vassals by Susan Reynolds, if you are interested in knowing why "feudal tyranny" is an oxymoron

2) What we are living under now is Feudalistic. It's governance regulating a ruling class in a socially stratifying manner. The move toward Laissez Faire economic Capitalism is seriously struggling; probably because of old world control measures.

Grok - Feudalism = a medieval socio-economic system based on land ownership (fiefs) granted in exchange for military service and loyalty, with a rigid hierarchy of lords, vassals, knights, and serfs who were tied to the land and had almost no personal freedom. In Replies

Feudalism ends with a powerful oligarchy instead of a pyramid with a king at the top. The King of France or the Holy Roman Emperor had less real power than their most powerful vassals. This leads to civil war.

The feudal model was a medieval socio-economic system where kings granted large land estates (fiefs) to nobles in exchange for military service, loyalty, and counsel. Nobles subdivided land to vassals or knights for similar oaths, while peasants (serfs) worked the land in return…

Clan/gang existence is the default setting That “feudal” hierarchy was built on centuries of clan leaders distinguishing themselves and developing their family lines/patronage networks We don’t have the social bonds/structure to just drop into hard feudalism

Eine feudale Gesellschaft bezeichnet ein mittelalterliches europäisches System (ca. 9.–15. Jh.), in dem Land als Lehen von einem Lehnsherrn an Vasallen vergeben wurde, die im Austausch militärischen Schutz und Dienste leisteten. Die Hierarchie umfasste Könige, Adelige, Ritter und…

Feudalism Breakdown: 👇 A long, long time ago, in a place called Feudo, there was a powerful King named King Edward. He had a very big land—so big that he could not take care of it all by himself. One day, King Edward called some rich and powerful men called Lords and said:

You should read the history of Europe. Feudalism was marked by hierarchical inequality and land-based power. Serfs and peasants couldn’t even freely leave the land. It created deep and institutionalised inequality by legally binding people to social classes.

By the High Middle Ages, new systems of vassalage were developed. Fiefs would no longer be granted to knights under hariot but would rather get passed down to the knight’s eldest son after death. This is primogeniture, and it led to the creation of a noble aristocracy.

Desgloso la pirámide feudal: Rey: máximo dirigente, en la cúspide nobiliaria (mucha veces de forma teórica). En principio el reparto de títulos nobiliarios era potestad suya.

We are in the early stages of voluntary techno feudalism where each billionaire is establishing their own fiefdom/status hierarchy. As a serf whose chosen their billionaire, your status rises of falls with that of your liege lord. May they have great success

To elaborate on why "feudalism" never existed:- Everyone has seen those pyramid diagrams that explain how "medieval society worked", with the king at the top, barons and lords on lower levels and the poor peasants at the bottom. Kids' textbooks explain that the king owned ...

Biggest lapse by @narendramodi @AmitShah is : Not meeting @RajivMessage . @InfinityMessage . RSS believes in "British caste hierarchy theory" which is root of all evil. We had #FeudalHierarchy, not #CasteHierarchy. Without course correction, @BJP4India will soon lose power.

“Feudalism” is great, if you are part of the ruling class that comes with certain privileges. Fealty is great on paper, but under feudalism, a man owes obligation to his lords, not to his ‘country’. History has taught us numerous succession crisis and civil wars because of this.

Feudalism, as a political/economic system, is directly birthed from the lack of administrative capacity in post-Roman successor states, requiring decentralization and outsourcing to military vassals. I don't even know it's supposed to look like "with modern technology".

Feudalism被日本人翻译成封建制度，中国人拿来直接用。但是欧洲的feudalism 与中国的封建不同的。在欧洲它特指中世紀欧洲的一种法律与军事相结合的习俗，盛行於9到15世紀，隨著16、17世紀民族國家的興起而式微。在中國系指古代天子依爵位高低將領土分封與宗室或功臣作為食邑的制度。

Feudalism was a system where a wealthy landed nobility controlled peasants known as serfs The elites provided serfs with a small piece of land on which to live. Although they paid taxes, serfs owned no property, had no economic power or upward mobility gen.medium.com/meet-your-new-…