#formalsemantics ผลการค้นหา
Zeqi Zhao came to Göttingen 9 years ago - she's a Uni Göttingen veteran, so to speak. We are glad that she pursues her PhD on the Mandarin multi-functional particle 'dou', and thus to have her in the Göttingen Linguistics Department for some time to come. #LinGoe #FormalSemantics
I can't stop reading the "tricky shift" observed here as a meta-comment at the formal operations involved in linking "darkly funny" to "plain dark" via some sort of coercion mechanism. #coercion #formalSemantics
My research group at #RuhrUniBochum is looking for a 4-year PhD student in #FormalSemantics, #PhilosophyOfLanguage, or #PhilosophyOfInformation. Application deadline: August 15. For the full job description, see: l.rub.de/1a8a1f70 [English version at the bottom of the page]
Me, too, @GameLinguist ! And I strongly beileve that there is so much computational cost on training NVIDIA chips for many operations that do not require it. A lot of benefits can come from those logically-oriented approaches. #AI #formalsemantics
Scripting videos for how to read and study for #formalsemantics - any tips?
"BARBARA PARTEE, IS THIS A GOOD TIME FOR FORMAL SEMANTICS?" vimeo.com/isthisagoodtim… #formalsemantics #barbarapartee #isthisagoodtimedotorg
New formal mechanized semantics of CHERI C language released, focusing on capabilities and undefined behavior. #CHERI #FormalSemantics bit.ly/443HNHs
Venhuizen et al: A Framework for Distributional Formal Semantics semanticsarchive.net/Archive/TlkYzE… #formalsemantics #distributionalsemantics
Graham Katz, you can be my King of France anytime #formalsemantics #lsa2011 #canisaythat
Cremers et al: Proceedings of the 21st Amsterdam Colloquium, 2017 semanticsarchive.net/Archive/jZiM2F… #formalsemantics #philosophyoflanguage
Calculating Projections via Type Checking by @kaleidotheater #dependenttypetheory #formalsemantics slideshare.net/kaleidotheater… @SlideShareさんから
#kjs: A Complete #formalsemantics of JavaScript #nodejs nodejsideas.com/post/kjs-a-com…
#kjs: A Complete #formalsemantics of JavaScript #javascript jsdevhub.com/post/kjs-a-com…
Buccola et al: Conceptual alternatives ift.tt/2gdScvk #concepts #languageofthought #formalsemantics
Schlenker et al: Super Semantics: a Unifying Framework for Meaning Phenomena in Nature ift.tt/378J3vE #formalsemantics
Buccola et al: Conceptual alternatives ift.tt/2gdScvk #concepts #languageofthought #formalsemantics
Syntax and grammar set constraints and possibilities. They define what sequences of words are well-formed, how phrases can combine, and how meaning can be structured. Without these “rules,” language would be chaotic. There would be no predictable way to generate meaning beyond
Arguably #math as a field of knowledge is a formal language (alternative theories are much more debatable). What distinguishes (sound) formal from natural languages is simpler syntax and "transparent" semantics. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transpare…
none of you are getting my point #ohmygodbru formal wording is okay. but in this case formal wording is used to puff up subjects in a very similar manner to ai and doesnt add any substances to the analysis n heres my full thoughts but its made in a whim so if anything lmk
Formalism also allows for a discussion to be formulated in such a way that it looks black and white. Therefore, if I write about Digital ID's and CBDC's, I can do this in such a way that makes it look like the world will be draconian, but this is a choice of framing.
Formalism in law and science allows for either vague or precise language such that if the speaker wishes they can be vague in their language or if the speaker wishes they can be absolutely coherent and very logical. Formalism allows for vague formulations.
Yes, formal logic is completely compatible with nominalism. @grok, can you explain why modus tollens can lead us to understanding the asymmetrical structure of existence statements, giving us falsification as the best known criterion to ensure eliminating falsehoods?
I think that the difference between formal logic and informal logic is not really in structure exactly. Formal logic is, as the name implies, more concerned with the form, the rules and transformations that are defined-ly possible, independent of content, kind of like containers
Pragmatics integration: Formal semantics incorporates implicatures and context (Gricean maxims) to resolve ambiguities, acknowledging that reason's "absolute principles" are context-bound, not universal absolutes.
Formalizing the Statement Before a proof is generated, the statement must be expressed mathematically — usually as a circuit or constraint system. This statement can represent a secret value or valid credentials that satisfy certain conditions.
Formally assess 1) truth of reasons or premises, 2) deductive validity, 3) cogency, and 4) soundness.
#formula : a fixed or conventional method in which anything is to be done, arranged, or said - French: Formule - German: die Formel - Italian: formula - Portuguese: fórmula - Spanish: fórmula
possibly our reality is memory but intuition? latin direct contemplation knowing for no reason this knowing it has no history again bottom up now topic information latin forma, form Form is a philosophical concept by Aristotle information interacts with form: final cause
Randomly found this in from Christopher Alexander Notes on the Synthesis of Form, page 76; formalism is a twice-lifted "image of image of the world" Great for image-shaped problems, not for new images
➡️Excited to share a new #blog from Cynergy4MIE partner Verum Software Tools BV: “Formal Methods: enhancing software engineering productivity and code correctness.” Check it out! 👆 cynergy4mie.eu/formal-methods…
When you write that 'syntax alone is insufficient for semantics' and some would still ask the LLMs to determine meaning for them rather than actually ask people what they mean when they say something
1. “Logic only needs a system of representation and truth-functions.” A formal system is not logic. A formal system has: no ontology no normativity no reason-giving force no truth-tracking obligations
english is a "natural" language where a word's syntactic category (noun, verb) has almost no meaning. all verbs being blue is useless. "formal" aka programming languages use syntactic category to directly convey meaning. think of forgetting to end a string with a quote
What’s meant by a ‘formal language’ there? The standard use is, as with Tarski, an artificial language with stipulated semantic and syntactic axioms. That’s not what you have in mind, I think — which is absolutely fair enough, but then the question is what you do mean by it.
Zeqi Zhao came to Göttingen 9 years ago - she's a Uni Göttingen veteran, so to speak. We are glad that she pursues her PhD on the Mandarin multi-functional particle 'dou', and thus to have her in the Göttingen Linguistics Department for some time to come. #LinGoe #FormalSemantics
I can't stop reading the "tricky shift" observed here as a meta-comment at the formal operations involved in linking "darkly funny" to "plain dark" via some sort of coercion mechanism. #coercion #formalSemantics
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.
United States Trends
- 1. Panthers 37.4K posts
- 2. Rams 26.8K posts
- 3. Colts 27.9K posts
- 4. Falcons 11.7K posts
- 5. Jets 34.9K posts
- 6. Browns 40.3K posts
- 7. Ole Miss 88.9K posts
- 8. #KeepPounding 6,698 posts
- 9. Texans 20.8K posts
- 10. Stafford 17.3K posts
- 11. Bryce Young 8,600 posts
- 12. Puka 11.4K posts
- 13. Saints 21.1K posts
- 14. Dolphins 9,221 posts
- 15. Lane Kiffin 113K posts
- 16. Nick Folk N/A
- 17. Niners 3,374 posts
- 18. Raheem Morris N/A
- 19. Stefanski 5,846 posts
- 20. #FTTB 3,642 posts