#constexprfunction ผลการค้นหา

How to check if instances of a class with a constexpr constructor get instantiated at compile time? stackoverflow.com/questions/7220… #constexprfunction #cpp #constexpr

overflow_meme's tweet image. How to check if instances of a class with a constexpr constructor get instantiated at compile time? stackoverflow.com/questions/7220… #constexprfunction #cpp #constexpr

@convex is the entire backend. Real-time database, auth across all Chrome extension contexts, queries and mutations, cron jobs for deadlines, actions for external APIs. Everything reactive, everything type-safe, everything connected.


I think we’re arguing semantics at this point. I agree the feature is useful, eg 2 threads can point to the value and have different write permissions. I’m not talking about the feature itself, I’m talking about how the feature is gated. “const” should mean FULL immutability


この「コンココンコンココンコンコン」のモーションテキスト素材お渡しするので、まだ3Dモデル持ってなくてコンコンできてないVTuberさんいらっしゃったら手軽にコンコンしてみませんか? 透過テキスト素材 16.gigafile.nu/0224-de90d9ddf… 使用例(私は乗算の縁取りつけた) youtube.com/shorts/onwQ1dg…

Ange_Shiraino's tweet image. この「コンココンコンココンコンコン」のモーションテキスト素材お渡しするので、まだ3Dモデル持ってなくてコンコンできてないVTuberさんいらっしゃったら手軽にコンコンしてみませんか?

透過テキスト素材
16.gigafile.nu/0224-de90d9ddf…

使用例(私は乗算の縁取りつけた)
youtube.com/shorts/onwQ1dg……

Then I can use it like this in a convex query function. This function helps me make sure my query return types are structured and I can handle them easier on the client. I prefer this method over throwing un-typed errors for the client to handle.

codingwithjamal's tweet image. Then I can use it like this in a convex query function. This function helps me make sure my query return types are structured and I can handle them easier on the client. I prefer this method over throwing un-typed errors for the client to handle.

Alert: Several individuals say #contexacapitale is showing inconsistent account balances. Make sure to review every transaction carefully

ayo0xyz's tweet image. Alert: Several individuals say #contexacapitale is showing inconsistent account balances. Make sure to review every transaction carefully

Exactly. It's what we are doing with "words" and then the combo of words. The visual representations are only part of the information we've derived, @const_solutions is the genius behind these.

PinkDragonflies's tweet image. Exactly. It's what we are doing with "words" and then the combo of words. The visual representations are only part of the information we've derived, @const_solutions is the genius behind these.

Ran the ConvBlock on a dummy 5x5 input (1 channel to 3 out, depth=2). Output shape: [1, 3, 5, 5], mean activation ~0.41. The cycle subtly shifts weights each pass, adding that breathing variability—nice for evading minima. For MNIST, I'd wrap this in a net like…


Função seno ou cosseno Ao invés de explicar a fundo irei mostrar um macete para facilitar sua vida Se a Função começa subindo= Sen Se a Função começa descendo= Con

Luucchez's tweet image. Função seno ou cosseno

Ao invés de explicar a fundo irei mostrar um macete para facilitar sua vida

Se a Função começa subindo= Sen
Se a Função começa descendo= Con
Luucchez's tweet image. Função seno ou cosseno

Ao invés de explicar a fundo irei mostrar um macete para facilitar sua vida

Se a Função começa subindo= Sen
Se a Função começa descendo= Con

Step 4: TEST YOUR CODE IN A PREVIEW ENVIRONMENT. Not kidding on this, it might work locally but in production it might break the website (speaking from experience 😭). With @convex and @vercel this is very easy to do. Recommend you check out the convex docs here:…


jQuery 1.x系が読み込まれているサイトの更新、変数constで宣言したら無視されるという全く今後役に立たない気がする発見。


"that which stands underneath" to "that which constitutes" to "having been constituted into/across" whereas -con instead of -trans would just yield "having been constituted with or alongside"


as const allows you to add satisfies never in a switch statement and make sure you handle all possible cases which is so fucking good probably my favorite feature


I agree that constexpr just seems a useless annotation since C++23. I mean, any function could just be constexpr by default, and the compiler can figure things out, like it already does.


Yes that’s what I was asking. So the second “const” prevents that then? I thought TS had a READ_ONLY keyword that did this?


There was a post by Michael Godebauer about benchmarks that showed how little const actually does as it's only about creating the object. The build function of const objects needs to be executed anyways


The real issue for me about constexpr is that one could argue it could be the default semantic that a function is usable compile time, like "constexpr everything".


constexpr isn't really to imply const explicitly (I do understand what u mean tho) and I feel it's actually cool ,'constexpr' shouldn't have to necessarily imply 'const'


Ah, I see what you mean. Yes, 'constexpr' functions are not guaranteed to be evaluated at compile time. They can be used both at runtime and compile time. If you want to enforce compile-time evaluation, you need to use 'consteval'


Do you have an example? 'constexpr' definitely implies 'const' Maybe you're thinking about 'constinit'. This one doesn't imply 'const' indeed.


ไม่พบผลลัพธ์สำหรับ "#constexprfunction"

How to check if instances of a class with a constexpr constructor get instantiated at compile time? stackoverflow.com/questions/7220… #constexprfunction #cpp #constexpr

overflow_meme's tweet image. How to check if instances of a class with a constexpr constructor get instantiated at compile time? stackoverflow.com/questions/7220… #constexprfunction #cpp #constexpr

Loading...

Something went wrong.


Something went wrong.


United States Trends