#p_hacking search results
For researchers: #Multiple_comparisons & #p_hacking: Incredibly important, commonly overlooked statistical concepts en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_dred…
Scientist debunks own study! #Statistics matter. #p_hacking #chocolate #weightloss #journalistproblems
Wiki: “[p-hacking] is the misuse of data analysis to find patterns in data that can be presented as statistically significant when in fact there is no real underlying effect” Want to become a #p_hacking detective? Join the @OSCGroningen workshop of @MasselinkMW on June 24!
🧐 😱 Are you unintentionally p-hacking? Learn what #phacking is and how to avoid it on June 24th! This workshop is by @MasselinkMW, who is a strong advocator of #OpenScience and is one of the founders of the @OSCGroningen! For more info, please see: openscience-groningen.nl/oscg-workshop-…
I suspect most "data-driven" PMs understand neither data nor math. #p_hacking #running_with_scissors
An interesting case of (un)intentional errors in reporting scientific results: #p_hacking wired.com/story/microsof…
Don’t be obsessed over Statistical Significance. The threshold p-value of 0.05 is just an arbitrary number. Substantively important effects may be statistically insignificant, and statistically significant results may be substantively unimportant. #p_Hacking
Oh look, a Tesla hustler thinks they did a science by repeatedly running the test with a result they did not like until it gave the “right” answer. explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php… $TSLA #p_hacking
Rigor slippage: "This is not science. It is storytelling." @stephaniemlee on @scifri goo.gl/tkbGj8 #p_hacking #bigdata #DataScience
مقولة ذات علاقة: "إن عذبت البيانات كفاية فستعترف بأي شيء" - رونالد كاوس #p_hacking #Analytics
Here's an example of #multiple_comparisons & #p_hacking matter in research blogs.discovermagazine.com/neuroskeptic/2… @Neuro_Skeptic
I'd heard of #fishing for p-value <0.05 but this is #p_hacking @bmj_latest #Statistics bmj.com/content/362/bm…
Gosh, I had no idea that science was so broken. #fraud #p_hacking #negligence #bias #hype I guess we philosophers were right all along to only trust our armchair deductions (NOT). I finally read @StuartJRitchie's book and highly recommend it to scientists & philosophers alike!
Interesting show on @BBC_Analysis tonight discussing the replication crisis & #p_hacking bbc.co.uk/programmes/m00…
este artículo está muy bien, aunq echo d menos conceptos #epistemología #p_hacking #data_dredging #paradigma #Popper #Kuhn cc @cartoblasto
استعراض لأزمة الثقة في نتائج البحوث العملية ودور #p_hacking فيها fivethirtyeight.com/features/scien… #Analytics
@DiegoKuonen @lisachwinter FYI > fivethirtyeight.com/features/scien… #p_hacking or why science is really f***ing hard...
The p-hackers toolkit P-hacking is a common and persistent problem in research, with impacts on the scientific literature, reporting, and practice in medicine. But what is it, really? #nerdygirl #P_hacking #research sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-p-hackers-…
Oh look, a Tesla hustler thinks they did a science by repeatedly running the test with a result they did not like until it gave the “right” answer. explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php… $TSLA #p_hacking
🧵 Στο τέλος, τα δεδομένα θα συμφωνήσουν με την υπόθεσή σου. #p_hacking
Added this thread as a blog post for easier sharing: youcanknowthings.com/2023/04/10/pre…
youcanknowthings.com
Previous drafts of Florida’s vaccine analysis tell a very different story – You Can Know Things
You may recall Florida’s vaccine analysis released last October which claimed that mRNA vaccines are associated with increased risk of cardiac death in young men. This week, the Tampa Bay Times...
・p値の解釈の問題 ・p-hacking/統計的脆弱性 ・これらの問題への対処 🔹p-hacking：有意差が出るようにサンプルサイズを制御したり結果を選んだりすること 現実そのものからでなく文字(論文)から真理を知ろうとした場合、そのリスクについて知らないわけにはいきません😲 #P値 #統計学 #p_hacking
The p-hackers toolkit P-hacking is a common and persistent problem in research, with impacts on the scientific literature, reporting, and practice in medicine. But what is it, really? #nerdygirl #P_hacking #research sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-p-hackers-…
Final touches prior to submission be like... #stat_significant #p_hacking #scientificdata #correlation #Science #highimpact #phdchat
Wiki: “[p-hacking] is the misuse of data analysis to find patterns in data that can be presented as statistically significant when in fact there is no real underlying effect” Want to become a #p_hacking detective? Join the @OSCGroningen workshop of @MasselinkMW on June 24!
🧐 😱 Are you unintentionally p-hacking? Learn what #phacking is and how to avoid it on June 24th! This workshop is by @MasselinkMW, who is a strong advocator of #OpenScience and is one of the founders of the @OSCGroningen! For more info, please see: openscience-groningen.nl/oscg-workshop-…
Gosh, I had no idea that science was so broken. #fraud #p_hacking #negligence #bias #hype I guess we philosophers were right all along to only trust our armchair deductions (NOT). I finally read @StuartJRitchie's book and highly recommend it to scientists & philosophers alike!
An interesting case of (un)intentional errors in reporting scientific results: #p_hacking wired.com/story/microsof…
#p_hacking #DHPSP #experimental results - truly significant or just math?
This figure is insane. The extreme underrepresentation of z-values between -2 and 2 (which is just around the commonly used p-value threshold of 0.05) demonstrates publication bias/p-hacking/etc. Sharp edge near the threshold. Source: arxiv.org/abs/2009.09440
I suspect most "data-driven" PMs understand neither data nor math. #p_hacking #running_with_scissors
From 2005: The paradox to articles like this: Showing the failures of other methods by using the same method. #PositivePredictiveValue #p_hacking #researchintegrity #falsefindings journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/a…
#p_hacking and #null_shellacking , two sides of the same coin, one done by authors, one done by reviewers
Interesting show on @BBC_Analysis tonight discussing the replication crisis & #p_hacking bbc.co.uk/programmes/m00…
Don’t be obsessed over Statistical Significance. The threshold p-value of 0.05 is just an arbitrary number. Substantively important effects may be statistically insignificant, and statistically significant results may be substantively unimportant. #p_Hacking
Wiki: “[p-hacking] is the misuse of data analysis to find patterns in data that can be presented as statistically significant when in fact there is no real underlying effect” Want to become a #p_hacking detective? Join the @OSCGroningen workshop of @MasselinkMW on June 24!
🧐 😱 Are you unintentionally p-hacking? Learn what #phacking is and how to avoid it on June 24th! This workshop is by @MasselinkMW, who is a strong advocator of #OpenScience and is one of the founders of the @OSCGroningen! For more info, please see: openscience-groningen.nl/oscg-workshop-…
・p値の解釈の問題 ・p-hacking/統計的脆弱性 ・これらの問題への対処 🔹p-hacking：有意差が出るようにサンプルサイズを制御したり結果を選んだりすること 現実そのものからでなく文字(論文)から真理を知ろうとした場合、そのリスクについて知らないわけにはいきません😲 #P値 #統計学 #p_hacking
Rigor slippage: "This is not science. It is storytelling." @stephaniemlee on @scifri goo.gl/tkbGj8 #p_hacking #bigdata #DataScience
Gosh, I had no idea that science was so broken. #fraud #p_hacking #negligence #bias #hype I guess we philosophers were right all along to only trust our armchair deductions (NOT). I finally read @StuartJRitchie's book and highly recommend it to scientists & philosophers alike!
![neilfws's profile picture. [data] science (now), [bio] informatics (previously), education, open [source|data|access|science], photographer](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1602150096673869824/xshZXwrj.jpg)
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.
United States Trends
- 1. Tim Cook N/A
- 2. John Ternus N/A
- 3. DPOY N/A
- 4. Thune N/A
- 5. Happy 420 N/A
- 6. Brandon Ingram N/A
- 7. SNAP N/A
- 8. Slade Cecconi N/A
- 9. Steve Jobs N/A
- 10. The Onion N/A
- 11. No FISA N/A
- 12. Matt Olson N/A
- 13. Lori Chavez-DeRemer N/A
- 14. Infowars N/A
- 15. Crosby N/A
- 16. Risto N/A
- 17. Defensive Player of the Year N/A
- 18. #thespreadsheet N/A
- 19. Victor Wembanyama N/A
- 20. #therookiespoilers N/A