Sammy
@ModerNighty
The concept of progress acts as a protective mechanism to shield us from the terrors of the future.
You might like
If someone asks you “Do you believe your religion is more true than other religions?”, and your answer isn’t a definitive “yes” then your professed religion isn’t your actual religion. For instance, Mr. Talarico would have no trouble declaring anti-racism more true than racism,
.@ezraklein: “Do you believe Christianity to be more true than other religions? .@jamestalarico: I believe Christianity points to the truth. I also think other religions of love point to the same truth. I've learned more about my tradition by learning more about Buddhism and
The purpose of democracy is not to elevate the lower class, but to launder power relations so that rulers can shirk their feudal obligations Feudalism was utopian compared to this
Fuedalism It’s called feudalism, but worse because the bank doesn’t have an obligation to protect you from Vikings
Are we still doing this? Fundamental failure to understand how civilizational cycles work. At the “height of their power” Rome’s birthrate collapsed among elites because their patriarchal religion died, hence mystery cults, hence orgies. By the time Christianity came on the scene
Rome didn't fall because the Romans were decadent and had orgies. They were the most decadent, and had the wildest orgies, at the height of their power. Rome fell after they became Christian.
"Society has undergone a Great Feminization" (woman voice) "Um is that why your boyfriend dumped you, bitch???" You can't write this stuff, folx
“Listen up friends, I’ve been hearing a lot of you talking about Carl Schmidt’s ‘Friend-enemy’ politics, and I want to make one thing clear. Schmidt was a Nazi, and if you talk ‘friend-enemy’ politics then you are my enemy. “I don’t want to hear about anthropology, or whether
For the 2nd day in a row, @MattWalshBlog has explicitly made the Friend-Enemy Distinction, a concept penned by Carl Schmitt, chief jurist of the Third Reich. And he does so in front of @benshapiro on the @charliekirk11 podcast. Let’s give Matt the benefit of the doubt and assume
If there is one thought-terminating cliche I could eliminate it would be this word “universalism” that has popped up on the RW internet over the last 5 years. Bluntly, “universalism” is an entirely overloaded term with more definitions than are easily listable. However, the way
White people were told "treat people the way you want to be treated" and unless everyone else is white, that's a suicide pact. The real golden rule is that the people with the gold make the rules.
Hitler used diplomacy, so you should never ever negotiate. The only way out is to fight to the bitter end no matter how bad it gets, just like… oh no… oh no no no no
Secularism not seriously being a thing is the most important discovery of the early third millennium. x.com/bronzeagemanti…
The old religious right, the throne and altar right had the supremacy of arms and government. It lost the argument. Since the 1950s the new republican religious movement has also shown itself ineffectual. These things have already been tried. It’s time to let secular right lead.
The primary upside of liberal democracy is very often alleged to be the peaceful transfer of power. This is such a towering load of fuckwaddery, it makes me want to shit upon the head of whoever came up with it. If you are in a political system in which power can be transferred
Statements like this really fascinate me. I see them a lot. "I'm usually against doxxing/violence/death penalty/bullying, but..." no you aren't, you have a set of circumstances where it's permissible like even the most fervent supporters of those things
the dumbest belief in the world is that the "rule of law" can be produced by writing down words it's a religion for atheists
The real critique of capitalism is one that communists are uniquely incapable of making because they'd have to admit that 1. markets are extremely efficient at meeting human material desires & 2. meeting human material desires does not make humans happy or healthy or good
This is a simple argument. I have made it to Wokal no less than two times. 1. Human relationships rely on enforcing moral boundaries; without that, they disintegrate. 2. Liberalism, qua liberalism, lacks an internal justification for any boundary that impedes the individual
This is just wrong. Liberalism is not about breaking human relationships. That's just silly. One reason this is all going nowhere is that people talk past each other, or play hide-the-ball with their end goals, and so nothing ever gets discussed properly.
This is the Mendoza line for 20th century history, especially for someone with “anti-communist” in their tag. Lindsay is repeating the propaganda line of every communist fellow-traveler in 1959. We are speed-running our way to lol-cow-dom.
the idea that you can separate power from wealth is kind of silly on its face there are 800-some Chinese billionaires & Xi can have any one of them black bagged & expropriated if he wants, he "holds" way more than a billion
Sam Francis explains that maintaining a republican form of government is impossible given the structure of the United States and basically every other modern country
The purpose of family is to harmonize men & women's incentives & political interests In the absence of family, they are activated as political blocs, a new source of political energy that's why the family is being dismantled
Bureaucracy operating free of “political control” is the definition of “arbitrary and capricious” power. “Political control” is a synonym of “public accountability,” but Summers thinks it’s “corrosive to democracy.” Democracy is when the government does what they want, while its
I join Treasury Secretaries Rubin, Geithner, Lew and Yellen in writing this @nytopinion guest essay because we are alarmed about the risks of arbitrary and capricious political control of federal payments, which would be unlawful and corrosive to our democracy.
I'd argue that Spengler *was* right but that "money is a power" was merely an obstacle and it was "solved" long ago Napoleon introduced fiat money so that the funding for his military campaigns didn't rely on the bankers; FDR did the same in the US and totally gutted the power
United States Trends
- 1. Tourette N/A
- 2. Lakers N/A
- 3. Pritchard N/A
- 4. Canada N/A
- 5. Kash N/A
- 6. Puerto Vallarta N/A
- 7. Celtics N/A
- 8. El Mencho N/A
- 9. #BaddiesUSA N/A
- 10. Canadians N/A
- 11. Reddick N/A
- 12. México N/A
- 13. Hocevar N/A
- 14. Pat Riley N/A
- 15. Jassi N/A
- 16. FBI Director N/A
- 17. #NASCAR N/A
- 18. Cartels N/A
- 19. CJNG N/A
- 20. Delroy N/A
You might like
-
Vaibhav Patil
@alex214_andriod -
The Spacers Guild — 🧑🏼🚀/uto
@SpacersGuild -
Knot Tying Rabbit
@KnotTyingRabbit -
P Z Yang
@PZ_Yang -
Duke Bouskill
@dukeitoutsports -
amanda
@nervousnerdess -
ISÄLVITI
@iaerntekn -
Außerirdischer
@crestfaIIen -
Vory62
@vory62 -
Christopher
@christopherrkay -
Tyler Kozlowski
@tykoz15 -
Jimmy
@tigerincup
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.