Refine
@RefineInk
Try it at http://refine.ink AI feedback for research Refine devotes hours of compute to help you find and fix issues that matter to readers and reviewers.
Refine is a diligence tool for science and any other area that demands the same high standards. You process a document. Refine studies it and flags anything that threatens correctness, consistency, or clarity. A Refine report saves hours or days of expert work. 1/
We at @RefineInk are very interested in providing feedback on all types of writing. For instance (🧵)
Here's your yearly reminder that an alligator is a reptile, except during Lent when it's a fish.
Nuevo sponsor #SOSZ26 Son @RefineInk, hacen revisión experta de documentos técnicos (académicos, finanzas, consultoría) en menos de 30 minutos Lo usan en Harvard, MIT, Stanford y +500 instituciones Apoyan #SOSZ26 porque apuestan por las comunidades q construyen cosas que importan
If you like @RefineInk and are interested in working with us to scale distribution/marketing, please DM. Must "get" the product and have relevant experience. About a half-time gig.
Not a mathematician by any means, but if I may chime in... Lobby your department and university for pretty generous budgets for compute. Pure math just became a capital intensive subject, and things will likely be pretty good for experts for are on board with that
So do any mathematicians wanna offer their advice to a first-year math PhD student, in light of the math AI/First Proof developments?
Great thread AI author v/s AI referee!
Third wolf 🐺 AI can serve as a competent technical referee on basically any paper with statistics and/or applied math content refine.ink
Hello economists! I use ChatGPT like many others, mostly for re-writing. I keep hearing about “agents” and integrations dramatically increasing productivity. What are people doing? How are you integrating AI into your workflow, and what am I missing? Thank you!
As a kid in elementary school, I dreamed of writing sci-fi after reading Liu Cixin’s The Rural Teacher. Today, a multi-agent AI workflow helped realize this dream in writing a piece of "Economics Sci-Fi." By treating individual heterogeneity as a fractal coastline (Hausdorff dim
To be clear: This is a pilot run by some AEA journals to evaluate the value of a tool like Refine at the conditional accept stage — it is not current policy or standard practice to use Refine.
I am very late to the party but @RefineInk is very good. When you prompt ChatGPT/Gemini/etc to proofread a paper, even on highest settings, they miss a lot of stuff even through repeated passes. For some reason Refine is very good at catching inconsistencies/errors/etc
Fair. Depends on journal. The top journal papers would survive it. The AER offers free Refine reviews for all conditionally accepted papers and the big majority of authors take this up.
A prompt just asking Claude Code to review is not near the technological frontier. If the journal uses a purpose-built tool to aid in review (as many editors are already doing, and nearly all soon will) the chance of acceptance goes down a lot. x.com/ben_moll/statu…
Sorry to shatter your dreams David, but @RefineInk begs to differ and took the scalpel to your slop in less than 30 mins 😃 refine.ink/app/session/35… Put differently: not quite there yet (as others have already said)
@RefineInk new ad?
Sorry to shatter your dreams David, but @RefineInk begs to differ and took the scalpel to your slop in less than 30 mins 😃 refine.ink/app/session/35… Put differently: not quite there yet (as others have already said)
Finally gave this a try on a paper I'm getting near submitting. I'm thoroughly impressed. Caught a few small technical issues like an outdated table or specification, which is already great, but I was most impressed with (1) meaningful economic and methodological suggestions,
I am super excited to share a new AI tool, Refine. Refine thoroughly studies research papers like a referee and finds issues with correctness, clarity, and consistency. In my own papers, it regularly catches problems that my coauthors and I missed. 1/
refine .ink is the future of paper reviews... genuinely helpful insights on complex multidisciplinary papers. i enjoy using it.
To be clear @RefineInk identified 17 issues, not just 2 (click the link to see them all). For a journal editor, this would definitely be enough to desk reject.
Sorry to shatter your dreams David, but @RefineInk begs to differ and took the scalpel to your slop in less than 30 mins 😃 refine.ink/app/session/35… Put differently: not quite there yet (as others have already said)
United States Trends
- 1. #AEWDynamite N/A
- 2. Josh Hubbard N/A
- 3. Acuff N/A
- 4. Arkansas N/A
- 5. Bama N/A
- 6. Darryn Peterson N/A
- 7. Auburn N/A
- 8. #LoveIsBlind N/A
- 9. Swerve N/A
- 10. Swerve N/A
- 11. #Illini N/A
- 12. UConn N/A
- 13. Hangman N/A
- 14. Creighton N/A
- 15. Mizzou N/A
- 16. Doug Shows N/A
- 17. Ewin N/A
- 18. Philon N/A
- 19. #SouthernCharm N/A
- 20. Nigel James N/A
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.