aaron_recompile's profile picture. Bitcoin protocol analysis, script engineering, and raw on-chain experiments.

› Recompile log: initializing...

Aaron Recompile

@aaron_recompile

Bitcoin protocol analysis, script engineering, and raw on-chain experiments. › Recompile log: initializing...

置頂

🎁 “Mastering Taproot” is now free to download. This book is written from a builder’s perspective: raw transactions, scripts, witness analysis, and reproducible testnet examples. Pay if you can — learn if you need. 🔗 leanpub.com/mastering-tapr… #Bitcoin #BitcoinCore #Bitcoindev


Aaron Recompile 已轉發

_________ . ---""" """--- . :______.-': : .--------------. : | ______ | | : : | |:______B:| | | > SYSTEM UP | | |:______B:| | |…


Core takeaways: The v30 change to OP_RETURN was never about “making JPEGs easier to put on-chain.” It’s an infrastructure update forced by emerging L2 protocols like BitVM and Citrea. This is a policy change — not a consensus change — and it does not create any risk of network…


New chapter from How People Tried to Push Non-Transaction Data into Bitcoin. Chapter 9 examines Runes from an engineering standpoint: a modern OP_RETURN-based token protocol that deliberately avoids the failure modes of witness-stuffed designs like BRC-20. Runes replace global…


New chapter is live. Chapter 8 — Ordinals: Taproot Envelopes and the Data Layer Explosion This chapter is about something bigger than “NFTs on Bitcoin.” It’s about how: Taproot quietly removed the 520-byte limits, witness became an unbounded data layer, OP_FALSE OP_IF turned…


One quick clarification after yesterday’s thread: I’m not taking a side in the filter debate. What I’m interested in is the structural gap in how different groups model Bitcoin. Some people reason locally (mempool, OP_RETURN bytes, direct limits). Others reason globally…


People say: “Bitcoin is dead.” Bitcoin: “Hold my Taproot.” Undertaker-level comeback every cycle. But behind the meme is a very real reason why Bitcoin never dies: • It’s a protocol layer, not a product • It’s becoming the global settlement layer • It has native value…

Bear: “Bitcoin is dead.” Bitcoin: “Hold my taproot.” 😵‍💫👇 If you want the serious version behind the meme — 这里是我刚发的长文(历史+工程+金融三重角度)



This whole thread is a great example of a recurring pattern in the OP_RETURN debate: Two groups are speaking from completely different layers of the Bitcoin stack. One group sees the system like this: “Contiguous data goes into OP_RETURN → so just limit OP_RETURN.” The other…

First, I just want to clarify that contiguous, to me, is only possible in OP_RETURN. All other systems require additional recompiling, so I don't consider this "contiguous" per se. And frankly you lost me on some of the alternate methods you're mentioning. My point is: there is…



New post: "The Anatomy of Bitcoin Scripts: From P2PKH to Taproot" Every Bitcoin address — from 2009 to today — follows one pattern: commit-reveal. This piece breaks down stack execution across all address types with ASCII visualizations. Companion notes to my book Mastering…


Before SegWit: Data embedding was a hack—Counterparty & Stamps squeezed bytes into scripts never meant to hold them. After P2WSH: Scripts became legitimate data containers. 75% cheaper. Structured witness space. The architecture that made Ordinals possible. Chapter 7 breaks…


🚨 New chapter published: “Stamp / Stamps — Bare Multisig as ‘Image Container’”. In this piece I explore how Stamps transformed the multisig structure of Bitcoin from a signature scheme into a data-warehouse: • 31-byte chunks encoded as fake pubkeys • Bare multisig outputs…


One additional observation from working through the Counterparty reconstruction: Fake-pubkey grinding is one of the cleanest historical examples showing the exact boundary between Bitcoin’s consensus rules and Bitcoin Core’s policy layer. Consensus requires that: — every pubkey…

📘 Working on Chapter 5 of my upcoming book, How People Tried to Push Non-Transaction Data into Bitcoin. This chapter covers Counterparty — the first protocol to systematically use bare multisig as a data container. I’m documenting the engineering path: — OP_RETURN as…



“It’s very attractive to the libertarian viewpoint if we can explain it properly. I’m better with code than with words though.” — Satoshi That’s exactly why I built this project the way I did — not as a debate about Bitcoin, but as reproducible engineering history.

1/ I’ve released my new research project: “How People Tried to Push Non-Transaction Data into Bitcoin.” A reproducible engineering history of Colored Coins → Omni → Counterparty → Stamps → Ordinals → Atomicals → RGB. GitBook: btcstudy.gitbook.io/bitcoin-data-e…



Here’s the part most people missed about Bitcoin Core v30: The OP_RETURN change wasn’t about Ordinals — it was about BitVM. Clementine needed ~144 bytes of anchor data and had to create unspendable Taproot outputs, permanently polluting the UTXO set. Core developers chose a…

aaron_recompile's tweet image. Here’s the part most people missed about Bitcoin Core v30:

The OP_RETURN change wasn’t about Ordinals — it was about BitVM.

Clementine needed ~144 bytes of anchor data and had to create unspendable Taproot outputs, permanently polluting the UTXO set.
Core developers chose a…

United States 趨勢

Loading...

Something went wrong.


Something went wrong.