To all RAW image processing devs: When implementing custom White Balance pickers do allow much larger sampling windows, hundreds or even thousands of pixels. All images have noise that messes it up and you have to average over much larger areas. 32 pixels is nothing @RawTherapee
No. That's a RAW image (from Sony A9 III). On the right is the cranked up saturation to visualize the noise splotches. And it makes it obvious that any averaging window must be much larger than the characteristic spatial size of a noise blob.
Interesting what they are doing in camera. Raw sensor noise don’t have a color clusters
Yes. All of them do. Not on purpose of course. But every single RAW image I've ever seen has this. That shot though is after median denoise (left) so the actual RAW color noise if finer grain (right) but still has features going way beyond 32 pixels in size.
You can kinda see all that in the raw RAW even without debayering. That's a "perfectly" flat gray ball.
United States 트렌드
- 1. Good Thursday 26K posts
- 2. Happy Halloween Eve 1,581 posts
- 3. #PitDark N/A
- 4. Talus Labs 21.3K posts
- 5. Happy Friday Eve N/A
- 6. #AskSRK 27.9K posts
- 7. #thursdayvibes 2,774 posts
- 8. #thursdaymotivation 3,049 posts
- 9. Super Sentai 1,389 posts
- 10. #ThursdayThoughts 2,523 posts
- 11. Happy Birthday Kat 1,278 posts
- 12. Tomorrow is Halloween 2,240 posts
- 13. ARC Raiders 19K posts
- 14. Austin Reaves 70.8K posts
- 15. President Xi 98.4K posts
- 16. Thune 35K posts
- 17. $KITKAT 22.4K posts
- 18. Xi Jinping 67.8K posts
- 19. Chipotle 6,754 posts
- 20. Sudan 862K posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.