To all RAW image processing devs: When implementing custom White Balance pickers do allow much larger sampling windows, hundreds or even thousands of pixels. All images have noise that messes it up and you have to average over much larger areas. 32 pixels is nothing @RawTherapee
No. That's a RAW image (from Sony A9 III). On the right is the cranked up saturation to visualize the noise splotches. And it makes it obvious that any averaging window must be much larger than the characteristic spatial size of a noise blob.
Interesting what they are doing in camera. Raw sensor noise don’t have a color clusters
Yes. All of them do. Not on purpose of course. But every single RAW image I've ever seen has this. That shot though is after median denoise (left) so the actual RAW color noise if finer grain (right) but still has features going way beyond 32 pixels in size.
You can kinda see all that in the raw RAW even without debayering. That's a "perfectly" flat gray ball.
United States 趋势
- 1. Powell 60.3K posts
- 2. Metchie 1,569 posts
- 3. Pierre Robert 1,017 posts
- 4. FOMC 54.7K posts
- 5. Michael Carter 2,042 posts
- 6. #NationalCatDay 4,704 posts
- 7. Huda 34.2K posts
- 8. The Fed 92.4K posts
- 9. Jennifer Welch 13.6K posts
- 10. Azure 19.4K posts
- 11. Sonya Massey 1,998 posts
- 12. DeJean N/A
- 13. HAZBINTOOZ 3,040 posts
- 14. Olandria 57.2K posts
- 15. NBA Street 3,149 posts
- 16. #SellingSunset 1,253 posts
- 17. Kat Abughazaleh 3,624 posts
- 18. Hutch 1,649 posts
- 19. #Spooktacular25 N/A
- 20. Sean Grayson N/A
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.