To all RAW image processing devs: When implementing custom White Balance pickers do allow much larger sampling windows, hundreds or even thousands of pixels. All images have noise that messes it up and you have to average over much larger areas. 32 pixels is nothing @RawTherapee
No. That's a RAW image (from Sony A9 III). On the right is the cranked up saturation to visualize the noise splotches. And it makes it obvious that any averaging window must be much larger than the characteristic spatial size of a noise blob.
Interesting what they are doing in camera. Raw sensor noise don’t have a color clusters
Yes. All of them do. Not on purpose of course. But every single RAW image I've ever seen has this. That shot though is after median denoise (left) so the actual RAW color noise if finer grain (right) but still has features going way beyond 32 pixels in size.
You can kinda see all that in the raw RAW even without debayering. That's a "perfectly" flat gray ball.
Hard to guess but this is how raw sensor data looks after basic demosaic. Maybe RawTherapy uses a strong color denoising, subsampling? Photone noise can't create color clusters.
No. This is nothing RawTherapee specific. That "noise" is present in raw sensor data and pretty much follows the Poisson distribution. You can actually simulate that.
United States トレンド
- 1. Louisville 73.5K posts
- 2. Jets 133K posts
- 3. Virginia 230K posts
- 4. MD-11 16.6K posts
- 5. Honolulu 7,511 posts
- 6. #OlandriaxGlamourWOTY 2,055 posts
- 7. Azzi 6,813 posts
- 8. Jared Isaacman 6,549 posts
- 9. #AreYouSure2 40.3K posts
- 10. Madrid 434K posts
- 11. UPS Flight 2976 13.8K posts
- 12. Colts 64.6K posts
- 13. Jay Jones 27K posts
- 14. Courtois 69.5K posts
- 15. Cheney 287K posts
- 16. Sarah Strong 1,416 posts
- 17. #いい推しの日 828K posts
- 18. UConn 5,526 posts
- 19. Miyares 14.6K posts
- 20. #JiminxJungKook 38.8K posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.