To all RAW image processing devs: When implementing custom White Balance pickers do allow much larger sampling windows, hundreds or even thousands of pixels. All images have noise that messes it up and you have to average over much larger areas. 32 pixels is nothing @RawTherapee
No. That's a RAW image (from Sony A9 III). On the right is the cranked up saturation to visualize the noise splotches. And it makes it obvious that any averaging window must be much larger than the characteristic spatial size of a noise blob.
Interesting what they are doing in camera. Raw sensor noise don’t have a color clusters
Yes. All of them do. Not on purpose of course. But every single RAW image I've ever seen has this. That shot though is after median denoise (left) so the actual RAW color noise if finer grain (right) but still has features going way beyond 32 pixels in size.
You can kinda see all that in the raw RAW even without debayering. That's a "perfectly" flat gray ball.
Hard to guess but this is how raw sensor data looks after basic demosaic. Maybe RawTherapy uses a strong color denoising, subsampling? Photone noise can't create color clusters.
No. This is nothing RawTherapee specific. That "noise" is present in raw sensor data and pretty much follows the Poisson distribution. You can actually simulate that.
United States 趋势
- 1. New York 21.4K posts
- 2. New York 21.4K posts
- 3. $TAPIR 1,653 posts
- 4. Virginia 524K posts
- 5. Texas 220K posts
- 6. Prop 50 179K posts
- 7. #DWTS 40.8K posts
- 8. Clippers 9,511 posts
- 9. Cuomo 408K posts
- 10. Harden 9,875 posts
- 11. TURN THE VOLUME UP 18.9K posts
- 12. Ty Lue N/A
- 13. Jay Jones 101K posts
- 14. Bulls 36.3K posts
- 15. Van Jones 2,286 posts
- 16. Sixers 12.9K posts
- 17. #Election2025 16.1K posts
- 18. Embiid 6,132 posts
- 19. Isaiah Joe N/A
- 20. WOKE IS BACK 35.9K posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.