depthsofwiki's profile picture. hi I am @anniierau!

depths of wikipedia!

@depthsofwiki

hi I am @anniierau!

lol don’t have much to say about “grokipedia” except it’s another Wikipedia rival built on Wikipedia’s content which mostly ends up reinforcing its influence, and I did laugh about how "depths of wikipedia" is a word for word copy except that one word

depthsofwiki's tweet image. lol don’t have much to say about “grokipedia” except it’s another Wikipedia rival built on Wikipedia’s content which mostly ends up reinforcing its influence, and I did laugh about how "depths of wikipedia" is a word for word copy except that one word
depthsofwiki's tweet image. lol don’t have much to say about “grokipedia” except it’s another Wikipedia rival built on Wikipedia’s content which mostly ends up reinforcing its influence, and I did laugh about how "depths of wikipedia" is a word for word copy except that one word

depths of wikipedia! hat repostet

Well there's your problem, knowledge can't be democratized. You can't put who won the Civil War up to a vote.


depths of wikipedia! hat repostet

Help! My encyclopaedia is too academic!

Wikipedia's current framework is "GASP": globalist, academic, secular, and progressive. Four of the theses are aimed at correcting, or reforming, this framework. But there are other ways in which Wikipedia needs to be reformed.

lsanger's tweet image. Wikipedia's current framework is "GASP": globalist, academic, secular, and progressive. Four of the theses are aimed at correcting, or reforming, this framework. But there are other ways in which Wikipedia needs to be reformed.


driving from jeffrey to jeff feels like classic jeff behavior

depthsofwiki's tweet image. driving from jeffrey to jeff feels like classic jeff behavior
depthsofwiki's tweet image. driving from jeffrey to jeff feels like classic jeff behavior

Loading...

Something went wrong.


Something went wrong.