eigenfactor's profile picture. Revealing the structure of scientific knowledge with @CT_Bergstrom and @JevinWest at the University of  Washington.

Eigenfactor Project

@eigenfactor

Revealing the structure of scientific knowledge with @CT_Bergstrom and @JevinWest at the University of Washington.

Eigenfactor Project reposteó

Trouble running Infomap in Windows? We now provide pre-compiled Infomap binaries for Windows. Download and run Infomap in the PowerShell. Feature request from many R users. Work by @antoneri and @daniel_edler. mapequation.org/infomap/#Downl…

m_rosvall's tweet image. Trouble running Infomap in Windows? We now provide pre-compiled Infomap binaries for Windows. Download and run Infomap in the PowerShell. Feature request from many R users. Work by @antoneri and @daniel_edler. mapequation.org/infomap/#Downl…

A wholly inadequate response to very good questions from @ScholarlyChickn

"The authors of a much–critiqued study of the beneficial effects of tweeting on citation and altmetrics speak, finally." scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2020/08/03/twe…

RetractionWatch's tweet image. "The authors of a much–critiqued study of the beneficial effects of tweeting on citation and altmetrics speak, finally."
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2020/08/03/twe…


Eigenfactor Project reposteó

Huge differences in search results on "COVID 19"|"SARS CoV 2" in search engines: @MSFTAcademic 401 Google Scholar: 739 @webofscience 1646 @Scopus 4889 @NCBI PubMed 8005 @TheLensOrg The Lens: 10450 @DSDimensions 10595 @CrossrefOrg 28246 Of course there is more to that... 1/15


Eigenfactor Project reposteó

This is the best thing ever

Google Scholar has parsed this cafeteria lunch menu as an author list, and it's delightful

AlexanderRKlotz's tweet image. Google Scholar has parsed this cafeteria lunch menu as an author list, and it's delightful


The joy of Altmetrics

Google Scholar has parsed this cafeteria lunch menu as an author list, and it's delightful

AlexanderRKlotz's tweet image. Google Scholar has parsed this cafeteria lunch menu as an author list, and it's delightful


Who presents and where? An analysis of research seminars in US economics departments Asier Minondo arxiv.org/abs/2001.10561

eigenfactor's tweet image. Who presents and where? An analysis of research seminars in US economics departments

Asier Minondo

arxiv.org/abs/2001.10561

Eigenfactor Project reposteó

Best predatory journal spam invite ever 🤣

cshperspectives's tweet image. Best predatory journal spam invite ever 🤣

Games academics play and their consequences: how authorship, h-index and journal impact factors are shaping the future of academia. h/t @LeeDugatkin royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rs…


Derek de Solla Price's family has developed a website with links to much of his work, including full texts of his books. derekdesollaprice.org h/t @joseph_fridman


Huge study documents gender gap in chemistry publishing nature.com/articles/d4158…


Eigenfactor Project reposteó

Important implications for the importance of blinded review, even in an age when we are increasingly moving toward open science. @NatureNews nature.com/articles/d4158…


We often assume that in an academic priority race, the first to publish gets all the credit. Fascinating empirical research on the consequences of getting scooped suggests otherwise.

Hey academics on Twitter: Have you ever been scooped? Do you worry about getting scooped? My job market paper estimates the consequences of getting scooped in science using cool data from structural biology. Let’s do a thread!



.@WDScholia seems like a project worth following. Very cool stuff.

Este tweet ya no está disponible.

Eigenfactor Project reposteó

"When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure." Italian academia discovers Goodhart's law the hard way. sciencemag.org/news/2019/09/c…


Eigenfactor Project reposteó

!!

Este tweet ya no está disponible.

Thread about the new rankings of 100,000 scientists published in PLoS Biology.

Este tweet ya no está disponible.

Eigenfactor Project reposteó

Why doesn't review look like this: 10 downloads/1cite requires just cursory check. Automatic accept. 100d/10c review by postdoc, 300d/30c plus Prof 1000/100 extra prof, 3k/300c plus statistician, 10k/1000c plus world leader. Never rejected. But reviews added, revision asked.


Loading...

Something went wrong.


Something went wrong.