You might like
What if a subtle way to undermine Bitcoin isn’t a direct attack, but quietly influencing its core devs? Pump cash their way, nudge “maintenance” tweaks over time (we’ve seen plenty of small code changes in Bitcoin’s history). Slip in a shady BIP, pair it with a centralized mining…
Just decided to stop being so arrogant and pretending like I knew the future. Seems like adoption is more likely the case and needs to be the case rather than Bitcoin disappearing. Basically just checked my ego at the door.
I’ve been running Knots since this whole thing started but this clip is telling. Run a node. And run Knots if for no other reason to let the devs know that fringe use cases aren’t justification for defying what a good many users clearly don’t want.
I’m the guest who asked the question and I applaud Jameson @Lopp for his brutal honesty in divulging his financial interests in the “problem” that’s solved by blowing out OP_RETURN.
It seems like Gloria (@glozow) deprecated herself again from X. I hope one day she deprecates herself from the bitcoin too. Bitcoin is not just a normal open source project. It's a sound money project and if you can't handle the heated argument from other side, you don't…
Do you know that there are a lot of resources and capital allocated for Core devs to work on soft-fork initiatives to make Bitcoin more programmable?
You wouldn't answer a single spam call. Why would you relay a single spam transaction? Keep #Bitcoin hard money. Run @BitcoinKnots.

You've been betrayed.


Ethereum Endorses Bitcoin Core (Breaking)
Bitcoin would not need the Internet if blocks were 300kB Would just broadcast by HF radio Just like your Casio watch can get the time f/ nuclear clocks automagically We could have low power wallets in pretty much anything without Internet Truly decentralize. Speed of light.
Congrats on being the first affinity scam to come out after v30.
Last Trezor I'll ever buy
"It’s not actually about the filters, it is about who has control over the default settings of the majority client." Not for me. For me it's about mindset. The mindset of miners, devs and users (node runners) should be "Bitcoin is money, not a data spam Dropbox"). Mindset.
Tomorrow? Nothing If someone wanted to ”destroy” Bitcoin by inserting illegal content into contiguous bytestreams and store them onchain, they can already do so right now. Several mining pools are already mining them. You can anonymously relay it, right now. It Bitcoin…
Core devs have explicitly stated they wish to expand OP_RETURN for the purpose of attracting arbitrary data away from fakepubkeys and other witness discounted hacks please read carefully
Just to be clear: Knots is not developed by one dev. The last release had about a hundred contributors. This is another lie from Core™.
As a (hopefully) temporary measure, run Knots. I strongly recommend not upgrading to Core v30. x.com/NickSzabo4/sta…
It's a very well-publicized increase in the OP_RETURN allowance that very publicly invites more non-financial data onto Bitcoin. Even though apps can already put data in other parts of Bitcoin, this increase sends a signal inviting more such data. Without adding safeguards to…
I would not update to Bitcoin Core v30: 1. It was never a debate, a decision was made. 2. Users are not stakeholders 3. Devs do not understand limits of own wisdom. 4. It's not a solution to a problem. 5. Risk of unintended consequences 6. No incentive to relay large op returns!
My fellow 80IQ plebs: - Bitcoin is about to go through one of the biggest attacks this Friday and I want you to keep an eye on following group of fake bitcoiners/clowns to make sure you are super toxic towards them and never ever forget to treat them worse than your worst enemy…
Reminder that filters made non-standard OP_RETURN transactions 3x more costly and 6x slower on average.
Update: There have been 11700 transactions since block 894289 that have had OP_RETURN size > 83. This is way more than the 30 from the first 4 months and it's probably because of @oomahq's challenge to make the non-standard OP_RETURNs more than 50% of the total OP_RETURNs.…
United States Trends
- 1. Lakers 93.6K posts
- 2. Luka 71.2K posts
- 3. Ayton 15.3K posts
- 4. Marcus Smart 8,641 posts
- 5. Curry 42K posts
- 6. Warriors 97.2K posts
- 7. Froot N/A
- 8. Rockets 59.6K posts
- 9. Pharos 9,797 posts
- 10. Draymond 8,674 posts
- 11. Reaves 9,293 posts
- 12. Double OT 6,766 posts
- 13. #DubNation 13.4K posts
- 14. #MLBS6Spoilers 4,985 posts
- 15. #DWTS 49.2K posts
- 16. Shai 34.1K posts
- 17. Jimmy Butler 9,738 posts
- 18. #LakeShow 6,608 posts
- 19. Sengun 25.8K posts
- 20. Vando 3,112 posts
You might like
-
CUE
@Cryptoextension -
Mike_D
@mike_d1213 -
擒牛的人(a股龙头选手)
@18xiaoyouzi -
小安
@O9SBHJ4BAxmzBXd -
左手墨迹
@Pandazhq -
MRRM
@MRRM65439097 -
二大爷
@tankman2002 -
大槻ひびき🥰
@OTSUKI221HIBIKI -
happyxiao.com
@happyxiaocom -
郭宇 guoyu.eth
@turingou -
happy xiao
@coolXiao -
Echo🇨🇳(互fo互赞前五)
@Ann68043584 -
The Gold Report
@SWGoldReport -
成田 修造 / Shuzo Narita
@shuzonarita -
高伐林
@GaoFalin
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.