naivebayesian's profile picture.

Naïve Bayesian

@naivebayesian

Thanks for the responses. :)


Hm. Interesting. So this doesn't work the same way as star-forming regions where the UV from new stars are absorbed and re-emitted in IR?


It wasn't accidental.


Oh.... Based on the year, I assumed he was talking about Python 2's end of life. :D


Why would I die before weighing myself in Mars? (Assuming I'm wearing a safety suit.) Oh, and that was an uncalled for burn. :P


My best wishes to you. :)


It would be nice if they'd coded something for @NASAJuno using @ProjectJupyter because, you know....


Yes, an explanation would be helpful.


Any chance you have the 'Comet Selfie' in colour? :) @elakdawalla


But then that would contradict its classification as a deuterostome, no? blogs.discovermagazine.com/deadthings/201… Cc: @newscientist @DiscoverMag


Not quite the Brits leaving - that's August 15th. January 26th is when the Indian Constitution came into effect. @elakdawalla


Cannon I and Cannon II.


Haha, ofc. I'm amazed such things can be detected at all. Planning to read abt the techniques over the weekend.


Very informative write-up. What does the "10 cm" refer to in the Bennu Natural Satellite Search?


Not just data, but data within accuracy limits. Keeping my fingers crossed for them avoiding another Hubble. @elakdawalla


Loading...

Something went wrong.


Something went wrong.