#errorfreecoding search results

No results for "#errorfreecoding"

The error analysis and re-exposure loop works really well. My repeat mistakes have dropped noticeably.


Zig tip: `errdefer comptime unreachable;` will ensure at compile time that from that point forward nothing can fail. This is an extremely important pattern since `errdefer` (cleanup on error) often depends on a particular state of the world and this asserts it. Example use case:…

mitchellh's tweet image. Zig tip: `errdefer comptime unreachable;` will ensure at compile time that from that point forward nothing can fail. This is an extremely important pattern since `errdefer` (cleanup on error) often depends on a particular state of the world and this asserts it.

Example use case:…

There are two ways to writing an error free code, only the third one works


How I look when I write one line of code but it actually works without errors

CodeEdison's tweet image. How I look when I write one line of code but it actually works without errors

Commenting out code is the fastest way to get rid of errors


Fun Fact: If your code works on the first try, don’t celebrate — you definitely missed something. 😅🙄 #coding #bugs #programming #reality


Exactly show that there's errors in every line won't be visible to others 😂


5. Try Except Real applications don't crash when a user makes a mistake. They handle it. Use this block to catch errors (like dividing by zero) and keep the program running smoothly. Code: try: print(10 / 0) except: print("Error occurred")

Blockhacks's tweet image. 5. Try Except

Real applications don't crash when a user makes a mistake. They handle it.

Use this block to catch errors (like dividing by zero) and keep the program running smoothly.

Code: try:  print(10 / 0) except:  print("Error occurred")

Coding automation's zero-tolerance for error makes it the perfect stress test for the low-variance output autonomous agents require for reliable long-horizon planning.


It prepares us to write code in one go without error


There are certain classes of errors that the coding models simply never make (basic syntax errors and the like); I’ve stopped caring about those, and meanwhile continue to invest in skills around organization, abstraction boundaries, ideal user workflows, and data model design.


Even simpler, don’t ever make any human mistake possible, at all, in decades old codebases that have been created by a lot of different developers, and keep doing that, forever

1. Every malloc must have exactly one matching free 2. Never dereference pointer to memory that was freed It’s really THAT simple.



It's even simpler: 1. Don't make any mistake, ever, even in codebase that spans millions of lines of code, decades in development, across various developer teams across time and in different parts of the world, with imperfect communication channels


No matter how many times you do it you’ll forget and it’ll have a new error next time. FYI


Bug‑free doesn’t exist. But healthy, evolving software does. At Codeac.io, every “one more bug” is a chance to improve. #Codeac #ContinuousImprovement #CleanCode

codeacio's tweet image. Bug‑free doesn’t exist. But healthy, evolving software does. At Codeac.io, every “one more bug” is a chance to improve.

#Codeac #ContinuousImprovement #CleanCode

My code compiled without errors on the first try Call me senior dev guys

TheLegionite's tweet image. My code compiled without errors on the first try

Call me senior dev guys

Yeah I know 0 errors is not possible at all


No results for "#errorfreecoding"
No results for "#errorfreecoding"
Loading...

Something went wrong.


Something went wrong.


United States Trends