#falsepositiverate search results

If you want to understand what #FalsePositiveRate means and what are the chances for someone, once tested, to have #Covid_19 , I'd recommend to listen to this great and very insightful interview of Professor Sir David Spiegelhalter at @MathsWorldUK youtube.com/watch?v=XmiEzi…


Fehlalarm? False-Positives scheinen ein notwendiges Übel in der Compliance zu sein, will man sicher gehen, dass einem keine Treffer durch die Lappen geht. Moderne Verfahren helfen, die #FalsePositiveRate zu senken. Mit #DataAnalytics in der #Compliance bit.ly/2NjwPJU


#FalsePositiveRate Eleven Frühjahrsumfrage 2013 Bedrohung durch gefährliche EMails hält weiter an newscomm.de/122649


Ja, und mit dem #PCRTest werden dann missbräuchlicher- und darum auch fälschlicherweise viele Patienten als #CoronaCases markiert (Missbrauch des Tests zur Diagnose, #FalsePositiveRate) und deswegen auch falsch gezählt und nicht unwahrscheinlich (unwillentlich) falsch behandelt.


> [..] The major attempt to define the #FalsePositiveRate was in a paper describing a new test methodology, but it has a built-in #ConflictOfInterest [presumably, because #Drosten is a co-author LG,I] [Euro Surveill. 2020 Jan 23; 25(3): 2000045]. Clearly, if the false positive >


#BilgrauFalgreenEtAl-13. "Our suggestions show that it is possible to easily perform statistical inference of ΔΔ𝘊_𝑞, whilst properly accounting for the AE uncertainty and better controlling the #FalsePositiveRate." M.t. 'Aus unseren Vorschläge geht hervor, dass es möglich >


So not vitally important ! - have you listened to the interview of @MichaelYeadon3 by @JamesDelingpole . #fallacy #falsepositiverate due to too much testing healthy non infected people swamping true rate. I sent it you earlier today #Delingpole podcast


@ #sensitivity: the Q seems to assume perfect sensitivity, so the probability of Dz is 1.96%. But if sensitivity is 10%, Prob(Dz) is 0.2%, a large population-level difference. I don't see the justification for asking a #bayestheorem Q w/o sensitivity - or with #falsepositiverate


Justice Kennedy: "People detained for minor offenses can turn out to be the most devious and dangerous criminals" #FalsePositiveRate


12.9/x con't quoting, "Some might conclude that that study LACKS credibility .. for eg, ..they PCR-tested 92% of Wuhan’s popn (~10m individuals) over a 19-day period at end of May, and found just 300 positive PCR tests, implying a #FalsePositiveRate of no greater than 0.003%."


⚠️ The #FalsePositiveRate (#FPR) is calculated as: False Positives ÷ Total Number of Alerts. A high FPR means more incorrect alerts, which can waste resources and reduce efficiency. Keep it low for better system performance! #MonitoringEfficiency #SecuritySolutions #StaySecure


Brilliant points from #SirDesmondSwayne: never ending lockdown bc of #falsepositiverate lockdowns stop attenuation of #viruses Sir Desmond Swayne: There's an urgency for Boris Johnson to lift lockdow... youtu.be/S0-NfJUeHY0 via @YouTube

redrobinway's tweet card. Sir Desmond Swayne: There's an urgency for Boris Johnson to lift...

youtube.com

YouTube

Sir Desmond Swayne: There's an urgency for Boris Johnson to lift...


via @NYTimes #falsepositiverate really matters for assessing prevalence. Most of the tests were unreliable #COVID19 nytimes.com/2020/04/24/hea…


Great resource at @FINDdx on the test accuracy of serological tests for #Covid_19. Note confidence intervals on specificity... finddx.shinyapps.io/COVID19DxData/ Then calculate #FalsePositiveRate for the expected low prevalence here: vassarstats.net Then get sober.

eggersnsf's tweet image. Great resource at @FINDdx on the test accuracy of serological tests for #Covid_19. Note confidence intervals on specificity... 
finddx.shinyapps.io/COVID19DxData/

Then calculate #FalsePositiveRate for the expected low prevalence here: 
vassarstats.net 

Then get sober.

Tree Fort Bikes: so serious about fraud detection that you can't even make a non-fraudulent purchase. #falsepositiverate=1 #lostbusiness


!!! WHAT IS GOV AIM ??? GOV CREATE FALSE ALARM, as with @MattHancock’s 1% vs 91% #FalsePositiveRate for @JuliaHB1 — then respond to alarm THAT THEY HAVE CAUSED !!! As country was recovering, + would have further, THEY MAGNIFY FEAR: WHY ???

This poll is what is driving the latest Government policies. Millions of people are too scared to listen to the actual facts about the risks of coronavirus & want to lockdown forever. This is mass hysteria.

JuliaHB1's tweet image. This poll is what is driving the latest Government policies. Millions of people are too scared to listen to the actual facts about the risks of coronavirus & want to lockdown forever. This is mass hysteria.


⚠️ The #FalsePositiveRate (#FPR) is calculated as: False Positives ÷ Total Number of Alerts. A high FPR means more incorrect alerts, which can waste resources and reduce efficiency. Keep it low for better system performance! #MonitoringEfficiency #SecuritySolutions #StaySecure


@ #sensitivity: the Q seems to assume perfect sensitivity, so the probability of Dz is 1.96%. But if sensitivity is 10%, Prob(Dz) is 0.2%, a large population-level difference. I don't see the justification for asking a #bayestheorem Q w/o sensitivity - or with #falsepositiverate


What's the #FalsePositiveRate? Because the #CostOfTheFalsePositives is enormous. Fool the world once, shame on you. It's not going to work again. popularrationalism.substack.com/p/open-letter-… <<<


Brilliant points from #SirDesmondSwayne: never ending lockdown bc of #falsepositiverate lockdowns stop attenuation of #viruses Sir Desmond Swayne: There's an urgency for Boris Johnson to lift lockdow... youtu.be/S0-NfJUeHY0 via @YouTube

redrobinway's tweet card. Sir Desmond Swayne: There's an urgency for Boris Johnson to lift...

youtube.com

YouTube

Sir Desmond Swayne: There's an urgency for Boris Johnson to lift...


12.9/x con't quoting, "Some might conclude that that study LACKS credibility .. for eg, ..they PCR-tested 92% of Wuhan’s popn (~10m individuals) over a 19-day period at end of May, and found just 300 positive PCR tests, implying a #FalsePositiveRate of no greater than 0.003%."


12.1/ con't "Data from #PCR_testing– for which there is NO proper determination of an end-to-end operational #FalsePositiveRate– has almost exclusively #dictated - TIER RESTRICTIONS & - #lockdown policy in #UK #PCR’s fingerprints can..be found all over entire global response.."


Ja, und mit dem #PCRTest werden dann missbräuchlicher- und darum auch fälschlicherweise viele Patienten als #CoronaCases markiert (Missbrauch des Tests zur Diagnose, #FalsePositiveRate) und deswegen auch falsch gezählt und nicht unwahrscheinlich (unwillentlich) falsch behandelt.


2/2 Paraphrasing, Eckert explains math By (somehow) increasing Error Rate (#FalsePositiveRate) - it does not matter how - while ALSO increasing widespread testing of asymptomatics, one will ALWAYS find CASES - thanks to this #FalsePositiveRate that fluctuates from 1 lab to next


So not vitally important ! - have you listened to the interview of @MichaelYeadon3 by @JamesDelingpole . #fallacy #falsepositiverate due to too much testing healthy non infected people swamping true rate. I sent it you earlier today #Delingpole podcast


If you want to understand what #FalsePositiveRate means and what are the chances for someone, once tested, to have #Covid_19 , I'd recommend to listen to this great and very insightful interview of Professor Sir David Spiegelhalter at @MathsWorldUK youtube.com/watch?v=XmiEzi…


!!! WHAT IS GOV AIM ??? GOV CREATE FALSE ALARM, as with @MattHancock’s 1% vs 91% #FalsePositiveRate for @JuliaHB1 — then respond to alarm THAT THEY HAVE CAUSED !!! As country was recovering, + would have further, THEY MAGNIFY FEAR: WHY ???

This poll is what is driving the latest Government policies. Millions of people are too scared to listen to the actual facts about the risks of coronavirus & want to lockdown forever. This is mass hysteria.

JuliaHB1's tweet image. This poll is what is driving the latest Government policies. Millions of people are too scared to listen to the actual facts about the risks of coronavirus &amp;amp; want to lockdown forever. This is mass hysteria.


via @NYTimes #falsepositiverate really matters for assessing prevalence. Most of the tests were unreliable #COVID19 nytimes.com/2020/04/24/hea…


Great resource at @FINDdx on the test accuracy of serological tests for #Covid_19. Note confidence intervals on specificity... finddx.shinyapps.io/COVID19DxData/ Then calculate #FalsePositiveRate for the expected low prevalence here: vassarstats.net Then get sober.

eggersnsf's tweet image. Great resource at @FINDdx on the test accuracy of serological tests for #Covid_19. Note confidence intervals on specificity... 
finddx.shinyapps.io/COVID19DxData/

Then calculate #FalsePositiveRate for the expected low prevalence here: 
vassarstats.net 

Then get sober.

> [..] The major attempt to define the #FalsePositiveRate was in a paper describing a new test methodology, but it has a built-in #ConflictOfInterest [presumably, because #Drosten is a co-author LG,I] [Euro Surveill. 2020 Jan 23; 25(3): 2000045]. Clearly, if the false positive >


#BilgrauFalgreenEtAl-13. "Our suggestions show that it is possible to easily perform statistical inference of ΔΔ𝘊_𝑞, whilst properly accounting for the AE uncertainty and better controlling the #FalsePositiveRate." M.t. 'Aus unseren Vorschläge geht hervor, dass es möglich >


No results for "#falsepositiverate"

Great resource at @FINDdx on the test accuracy of serological tests for #Covid_19. Note confidence intervals on specificity... finddx.shinyapps.io/COVID19DxData/ Then calculate #FalsePositiveRate for the expected low prevalence here: vassarstats.net Then get sober.

eggersnsf's tweet image. Great resource at @FINDdx on the test accuracy of serological tests for #Covid_19. Note confidence intervals on specificity... 
finddx.shinyapps.io/COVID19DxData/

Then calculate #FalsePositiveRate for the expected low prevalence here: 
vassarstats.net 

Then get sober.

Loading...

Something went wrong.


Something went wrong.