#flawcytometry 검색 결과
Well, that’s an understated #retraction notice. “data presented in Figure 3B cannot be validated, and the conclusions drawn from the data and figures are unreliable.” These panels look manipulated. #FlawCytometry HT: @gcabanac pubpeer.com/publications/8…
From the same paper (which is a typical #PaperMill paper, probably completely fake), here are some #FlawCytometry #FlowCytometry images #ImageForensics Can you spot it?
#ImageForensics - #FlawCytometry edition. This paper was retracted for problems in another figure, but nothing was mentioned about this set of panels. Can you spot it? pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30249278/
Yes, some data points are duplicated in both of the siNC and siIFITM1 plots (C and D)! Great work academic twitter, I have added the #FlawCytometry to my comment on PubPeer :)
Somewhere, there is an underpaid, poor employee at the #PaperMill who has to manually create all these #FlawCytometry dots. It's like scientific #pointillism DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S257598 @DovePress might want to take a look.
Author writes back: "Oh yes, we noticed this too. It's a mistake. We will ask for a correction". #ImageForensics #FlawCytometry
Quality research from the Medical University of Bialystok, published in @BioMedCentral Environmental Health, investigating neutrophil responses in men and women. /s #FlawCytometry #ImageForensics
Two retractions today @SpandidosP journals. Both involved #FlawCytometry, flow cytometry images with implausible duplicated groups of dots. pubpeer.com/publications/5… and pubpeer.com/publications/E… HT: @SmutClyde
Deep sigh. @Tandfonline issues a correction for these #FlawCytometry panels. Authors apologize for "an accidental duplication". Come on, Taylor and Francis - can you please revisit this #BadEditorialDecision ? pubpeer.com/publications/6…
I've been working on this paper for hours. Here are the 4 #FlawCytometry figures from this paper, marked by me for similarities. Each figure represents a different part of the brain. This paper has been cited 39 times. 😱 pubpeer.com/publications/9…
Looking forward to speak tomorrow at the flowcytometryUK 2021 meeting @RoyalMicroSoc 16:30 (4:30 pm) GMT Of course, I will show plenty of #FlawCytometry examples! rms.org.uk/rms-event-cale…
Still time to register for flowcytometryUK 2021 (formerly One Day flowcytometryUK) which starts ⚡TOMORROW⚡ Online event with talks, commercial presentations, workshops and more! Register here: ow.ly/rvm350GuohC @RMS_EarlyCareer @flowcytometryUK @JofMicroscopy
This is so disturbing. Probably just the tip of the iceberg. #PaperMills #FlawCytometry #westernbought
I am ringing the alarm. We have now found >400 papers that all share a very similar title layout, graph layout, and (most importantly) the same Western blot layout. This is a massive #PaperMill of (what we assume) fabricated data.
Two retractions today @SpandidosP journals. Both involved #FlawCytometry, flow cytometry images with implausible duplicated groups of dots. pubpeer.com/publications/5… and pubpeer.com/publications/E… HT: @SmutClyde
And another retraction, @SpandidosP, of this #FlawCytometry art. pubpeer.com/publications/A… Also HT: @SmutClyde
Well, that’s an understated #retraction notice. “data presented in Figure 3B cannot be validated, and the conclusions drawn from the data and figures are unreliable.” These panels look manipulated. #FlawCytometry HT: @gcabanac pubpeer.com/publications/8…
Quality research from the Medical University of Bialystok, published in @BioMedCentral Environmental Health, investigating neutrophil responses in men and women. /s #FlawCytometry #ImageForensics
#FlawCytometry Brilliant pun...terrible implications for veracity scientific literature
Deep sigh. @Tandfonline issues a correction for these #FlawCytometry panels. Authors apologize for "an accidental duplication". Come on, Taylor and Francis - can you please revisit this #BadEditorialDecision ? pubpeer.com/publications/6…
More in the series Crap That Should Never Have Been Published: #FlawCytometry #PubPeerPearls pubpeer.com/publications/6…
Yes, some data points are duplicated in both of the siNC and siIFITM1 plots (C and D)! Great work academic twitter, I have added the #FlawCytometry to my comment on PubPeer :)
From the same paper (which is a typical #PaperMill paper, probably completely fake), here are some #FlawCytometry #FlowCytometry images #ImageForensics Can you spot it?
Looking forward to speak tomorrow at the flowcytometryUK 2021 meeting @RoyalMicroSoc 16:30 (4:30 pm) GMT Of course, I will show plenty of #FlawCytometry examples! rms.org.uk/rms-event-cale…
Still time to register for flowcytometryUK 2021 (formerly One Day flowcytometryUK) which starts ⚡TOMORROW⚡ Online event with talks, commercial presentations, workshops and more! Register here: ow.ly/rvm350GuohC @RMS_EarlyCareer @flowcytometryUK @JofMicroscopy
I can only say I probably would have not caught this with my own eyes....maybe some machine learning would have helped me catch the #FlawCytometry 😛
Somewhere, there is an underpaid, poor employee at the #PaperMill who has to manually create all these #FlawCytometry dots. It's like scientific #pointillism DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S257598 @DovePress might want to take a look.
Well, that’s an understated #retraction notice. “data presented in Figure 3B cannot be validated, and the conclusions drawn from the data and figures are unreliable.” These panels look manipulated. #FlawCytometry HT: @gcabanac pubpeer.com/publications/8…
From the same paper (which is a typical #PaperMill paper, probably completely fake), here are some #FlawCytometry #FlowCytometry images #ImageForensics Can you spot it?
#ImageForensics #FlawCytometry edition. Each panel should look different and unique. Look carefully at the different quadrants to see if this image has some duplications. This is a beauty! Level: Advanced.
Somewhere, there is an underpaid, poor employee at the #PaperMill who has to manually create all these #FlawCytometry dots. It's like scientific #pointillism DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S257598 @DovePress might want to take a look.
Quality research from the Medical University of Bialystok, published in @BioMedCentral Environmental Health, investigating neutrophil responses in men and women. /s #FlawCytometry #ImageForensics
I've been working on this paper for hours. Here are the 4 #FlawCytometry figures from this paper, marked by me for similarities. Each figure represents a different part of the brain. This paper has been cited 39 times. 😱 pubpeer.com/publications/9…
Two retractions today @SpandidosP journals. Both involved #FlawCytometry, flow cytometry images with implausible duplicated groups of dots. pubpeer.com/publications/5… and pubpeer.com/publications/E… HT: @SmutClyde
Author writes back: "Oh yes, we noticed this too. It's a mistake. We will ask for a correction". #ImageForensics #FlawCytometry
Deep sigh. @Tandfonline issues a correction for these #FlawCytometry panels. Authors apologize for "an accidental duplication". Come on, Taylor and Francis - can you please revisit this #BadEditorialDecision ? pubpeer.com/publications/6…
And another retraction, @SpandidosP, of this #FlawCytometry art. pubpeer.com/publications/A… Also HT: @SmutClyde
#ImageForensics - #FlawCytometry edition. This paper was retracted for problems in another figure, but nothing was mentioned about this set of panels. Can you spot it? pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30249278/
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.
United States Trends
- 1. Good Friday N/A
- 2. Good Friday N/A
- 3. $ROCKET N/A
- 4. F-15 N/A
- 5. Theo N/A
- 6. Viernes Santo N/A
- 7. #FursuitFriday N/A
- 8. Fraud Czar N/A
- 9. #LastFourWatched N/A
- 10. #OnlyFriendsDreamOnEP6 N/A
- 11. #FanCashDropPromotion N/A
- 12. Holostars N/A
- 13. #FridayVibes N/A
- 14. CSAR N/A
- 15. Memphis N/A
- 16. Hassett N/A
- 17. IT IS FINISHED N/A
- 18. Mark Lee N/A
- 19. Happy Friyay N/A
- 20. Enzo N/A