#safeprogramming kết quả tìm kiếm

Không có kết quả nào cho "#safeprogramming"

Open source. AI-generated code. Third-party components. Software supply chain attacks are up. Are you ready? runsafe.ly/4rqI9Dt

RunSafeSecurity's tweet image. Open source. AI-generated code. Third-party components.

Software supply chain attacks are up. Are you ready?

runsafe.ly/4rqI9Dt

Build safe apps with familiar languages for simpler development.


Watch @lauriewired’s video about it. She explains how it is. Nevertheless, a competent C++ programmer can make it safe for 99% of use cases without the false sense of security that comes with 2,937 uses of the unsafe keyword.


LLMs often detect malicious intent, but structured inputs leave them no safe choice. ⚠️ Safe Harbor fixes that. 🚢 An open source safety path that lets agents abort unsafe workflows in real time. Developer-friendly. Real protection. 🛡️ Explore now ➡️ eu1.hubs.ly/H0q9MzG0

zenitysec's tweet image. LLMs often detect malicious intent, but structured inputs leave them no safe choice. ⚠️

Safe Harbor fixes that. 🚢

An open source safety path that lets agents abort unsafe workflows in real time. Developer-friendly. Real protection. 🛡️

Explore now ➡️ eu1.hubs.ly/H0q9MzG0

“We’re going to make our programs safe, reliable, and as efficient as possible given our constraints.” Modern programmers:


Picture this: AI glitches, but your plant doesn't spiral into chaos! The secret? Fail-safe design. When AI stumbles, your system defaults to SAFE. Seen this in action? #AISafety #OTSecurity


Security isn’t achieved with one technique– it’s a layered strategy. 🧰 In traditional testing, developers use heuristics: code reviews for intuition, fuzzing for unexpected behavior, threat modeling for architectural insight. Rust adds memory safety rules that can eliminate…

TrustInSoft's tweet image. Security isn’t achieved with one technique– it’s a layered strategy. 🧰

In traditional testing, developers use heuristics: code reviews for intuition, fuzzing for unexpected behavior, threat modeling for architectural insight. Rust adds memory safety rules that can eliminate…

safety first approach is smart, never running the code


Look at this beautiful code, 0 unsafe keywords were used.

devabram's tweet image. Look at this beautiful code, 0 unsafe keywords were used.

Now at 100k+ weekly downloads, Safe chain is the safe default for devs. Free to use. Open source. Protects against malware before install. -> github.com/AikidoSec/safe…

AikidoSecurity's tweet image. Now at 100k+ weekly downloads, Safe chain is the safe default for devs.

Free to use. Open source. Protects against malware before install.
-> github.com/AikidoSec/safe…

Have you looked at fil-c? @filpizlo is doing exceptional work making c/c++ safe by default


> the end user program is what protects the underlying libraries from exposing vulnerabilities That’s definitely not true. It’s the opposite: if you have code written in a type safe language calling APIs written in an unsafe language and those APIs are stateful, then a mistake…


The Fil-C hype is getting too much Crashing your program on a memory error definitely makes it safer, but it doesn't help you eliminate such bugs before you encounter them Runtime safety is just insurance... Compiletime safety is a guardrail that you cannot jump over...


We can define macro SAFE and mark code block that we are absolutely sure is tested and safe.


It doesn't launch a nuclear bomb, so indeed very safe! Burning through CPU time without the potential for further bugs is also a very safe strategy for Microsoft to earn money. Also, writing this should also be a very safe way to get fired.


Không có kết quả nào cho "#safeprogramming"
Không có kết quả nào cho "#safeprogramming"
Loading...

Something went wrong.


Something went wrong.


United States Trends