JavaScript Tips
@JavaScriptWsdom
Insightful and practical JavaScript wisdom.
قد يعجبك
You might not need jQuery, as post-IE8 browsers are pretty easy to deal with. Read more at youmightnotneedjquery.com
A great article from Douglass Crockford about using private members in JavaScript javascript.crockford.com/private.html
Testing in Chrome 36, Array.prototype.filter is 95% slower than a for loop jsperf.com/aarontgrogg-ar…
Modern browsers adhering to ECMA Script 5.1 support the indexOf method on arrays. ecma-international.org/ecma-262/5.1/#…
JavaScript doesn't have block scope; program accordingly.
String concatenation performance can vary dramatically from browser to browser. For example, run jsperf.com/string-concate… in IE and Chrome.
We all love jQuery and Underscore, but when it comes to speed, prefer native for-loops over _.each or $.each jsperf.com/jquery-each-vs…
Prefer checking equality using === rather than ==. === compares value _and_ type, is more explicit and also slightly faster #JavaScript
Follow this account to suggest and receive JavaScript tips and advice! #JavaScript #jQuery
If using global variables, prefix them with "window" so that scope resolution is clearly understood by the dev. (I.e. window.[identifier])
United States الاتجاهات
- 1. Rams 76.1K posts
- 2. Rams 76.1K posts
- 3. Sam Darnold 19.7K posts
- 4. Puka 51.1K posts
- 5. #heatedrivalry 59.3K posts
- 6. ilya 61K posts
- 7. Stafford 21K posts
- 8. Al Michaels 2,732 posts
- 9. svetlana 4,857 posts
- 10. #TNFonPrime 6,249 posts
- 11. SCOTT HUNTER 5,763 posts
- 12. McVay 7,686 posts
- 13. Rose 165K posts
- 14. connor storrie 14.8K posts
- 15. jacob tierney 3,886 posts
- 16. Ben Shapiro 41.5K posts
- 17. Blazers 2,564 posts
- 18. Niners 2,784 posts
- 19. #PowerForce N/A
- 20. #zzzSpecialProgram 4,657 posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.