おすすめツイート
You might not need jQuery, as post-IE8 browsers are pretty easy to deal with. Read more at youmightnotneedjquery.com
A great article from Douglass Crockford about using private members in JavaScript javascript.crockford.com/private.html
Testing in Chrome 36, Array.prototype.filter is 95% slower than a for loop jsperf.com/aarontgrogg-ar…
Modern browsers adhering to ECMA Script 5.1 support the indexOf method on arrays. ecma-international.org/ecma-262/5.1/#…
JavaScript doesn't have block scope; program accordingly.
String concatenation performance can vary dramatically from browser to browser. For example, run jsperf.com/string-concate… in IE and Chrome.
We all love jQuery and Underscore, but when it comes to speed, prefer native for-loops over _.each or $.each jsperf.com/jquery-each-vs…
Instead of trying to decipher the Date API, just use Moment.js (momentjs.com)
Prefer checking equality using === rather than ==. === compares value _and_ type, is more explicit and also slightly faster #JavaScript
Follow this account to suggest and receive JavaScript tips and advice! #JavaScript #jQuery
If using global variables, prefix them with "window" so that scope resolution is clearly understood by the dev. (I.e. window.[identifier])
United States トレンド
- 1. Colts 47.6K posts
- 2. Rivers 58.8K posts
- 3. Brock Purdy 16.6K posts
- 4. Niners 8,627 posts
- 5. #FTTB 6,660 posts
- 6. gaten 4,405 posts
- 7. Kittle 8,786 posts
- 8. Ballard 2,975 posts
- 9. Dee Winters 2,323 posts
- 10. Adam the Woo 2,718 posts
- 11. #WWERaw 22.5K posts
- 12. Tonges 1,343 posts
- 13. #SFvsIND 2,233 posts
- 14. #ForTheShoe 2,458 posts
- 15. Alec Pierce 3,615 posts
- 16. Jennings 15.7K posts
- 17. Tyler Warren 2,368 posts
- 18. Jonathan Taylor 3,344 posts
- 19. Ivey 1,101 posts
- 20. #LADS2ndAnniversary 6,467 posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.