おすすめツイート
You might not need jQuery, as post-IE8 browsers are pretty easy to deal with. Read more at youmightnotneedjquery.com
A great article from Douglass Crockford about using private members in JavaScript javascript.crockford.com/private.html
Testing in Chrome 36, Array.prototype.filter is 95% slower than a for loop jsperf.com/aarontgrogg-ar…
Modern browsers adhering to ECMA Script 5.1 support the indexOf method on arrays. ecma-international.org/ecma-262/5.1/#…
JavaScript doesn't have block scope; program accordingly.
String concatenation performance can vary dramatically from browser to browser. For example, run jsperf.com/string-concate… in IE and Chrome.
We all love jQuery and Underscore, but when it comes to speed, prefer native for-loops over _.each or $.each jsperf.com/jquery-each-vs…
Instead of trying to decipher the Date API, just use Moment.js (momentjs.com)
Prefer checking equality using === rather than ==. === compares value _and_ type, is more explicit and also slightly faster #JavaScript
Follow this account to suggest and receive JavaScript tips and advice! #JavaScript #jQuery
If using global variables, prefix them with "window" so that scope resolution is clearly understood by the dev. (I.e. window.[identifier])
United States トレンド
- 1. Trench 6,828 posts
- 2. Godzilla 22.6K posts
- 3. Richardson 3,160 posts
- 4. Foden 12.5K posts
- 5. Hato 24.5K posts
- 6. Frey 22.8K posts
- 7. Hefner 1,115 posts
- 8. Brugge 29.6K posts
- 9. Ferran 11.6K posts
- 10. Flick 27.9K posts
- 11. Shabbat 1,693 posts
- 12. Tosin 13.7K posts
- 13. Lina Khan 5,784 posts
- 14. Stearns N/A
- 15. $DUOL 1,686 posts
- 16. Minneapolis 54.2K posts
- 17. Jared Golden 1,266 posts
- 18. Qarabag 47.8K posts
- 19. Balde 9,002 posts
- 20. NYPD 36.8K posts
おすすめツイート
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.