JavaScript Tips
@JavaScriptWsdom
Insightful and practical JavaScript wisdom.
Potrebbero piacerti
You might not need jQuery, as post-IE8 browsers are pretty easy to deal with. Read more at youmightnotneedjquery.com
A great article from Douglass Crockford about using private members in JavaScript javascript.crockford.com/private.html
Testing in Chrome 36, Array.prototype.filter is 95% slower than a for loop jsperf.com/aarontgrogg-ar…
Modern browsers adhering to ECMA Script 5.1 support the indexOf method on arrays. ecma-international.org/ecma-262/5.1/#…
JavaScript doesn't have block scope; program accordingly.
String concatenation performance can vary dramatically from browser to browser. For example, run jsperf.com/string-concate… in IE and Chrome.
We all love jQuery and Underscore, but when it comes to speed, prefer native for-loops over _.each or $.each jsperf.com/jquery-each-vs…
Prefer checking equality using === rather than ==. === compares value _and_ type, is more explicit and also slightly faster #JavaScript
Follow this account to suggest and receive JavaScript tips and advice! #JavaScript #jQuery
If using global variables, prefix them with "window" so that scope resolution is clearly understood by the dev. (I.e. window.[identifier])
United States Tendenze
- 1. Bama 32.1K posts
- 2. Oklahoma 54.4K posts
- 3. Ryan Williams 3,466 posts
- 4. Mateer 10.6K posts
- 5. #JakeJoshua 38.4K posts
- 6. Ty Simpson 4,246 posts
- 7. #CFBPlayoff 12.6K posts
- 8. Epstein 1.11M posts
- 9. #RollTide 11.4K posts
- 10. Clinton 209K posts
- 11. Woodley 16K posts
- 12. Anderson Silva 12.3K posts
- 13. 50 Cent 30.9K posts
- 14. #SmackDown 18.2K posts
- 15. Alycia 5,891 posts
- 16. #BostonBlue 2,794 posts
- 17. Chris Finch 2,739 posts
- 18. DeBoer 6,667 posts
- 19. Bernard 9,678 posts
- 20. Many Men 16.7K posts
Potrebbero piacerti
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.