1/7 ⚛️ Level 1: Simple & straightforward grouping by file types. Good for small to medium projects, but maintenance can be a headache as the project grows. #React #FolderStructure
2/7 ⚛️ Level 2: Grouping by file types and features. Provides better organization, making it easier to locate and manage related code. Ideal for medium to large projects. #React #FolderStructure
3/7 ⚛️ Level 3: Highly modular approach, grouping by features/modules. Offers clear boundaries and scalability for large and complex projects. Requires good understanding of business logic. #React #FolderStructure
4/7 Give Consistent Meanings to Folder Names: UI Components React Specific Utilities & External Integrations Business Logic Styles TypeScript and Configurations Server Communication State Management Routing Testing
5/7 Conclusion: Choose the right folder structure based on project size and complexity. While Level 1 may suffice for small projects, Level 2 and Level 3 offer more organization and scalability. Consistent folder naming fosters intuitive architecture. #React #FolderStructure
6/7 Folder Structures in React Projects: Level 1: Simple & straightforward Level 2: Grouping by file types and features Level 3: Grouping by features/modules
7/7 Whether you're starting a new React project or improving an existing one, thoughtful folder structuring can greatly impact maintainability and scalability. Choose wisely! #React #FolderStructure #WebDev 🚀
United States Tren
- 1. Carson Beck 3,448 posts
- 2. Vandy 12.3K posts
- 3. Miami 61.3K posts
- 4. Clemson 11.6K posts
- 5. Mario 64.5K posts
- 6. Jeremiah Smith 8,610 posts
- 7. Texas 116K posts
- 8. Ohio State 17.3K posts
- 9. Jeff Sims 1,129 posts
- 10. Vanderbilt 9,913 posts
- 11. Dawson 4,618 posts
- 12. Julian Sayin 6,666 posts
- 13. #UFCVegas110 3,369 posts
- 14. Dabo 2,731 posts
- 15. Pavia 4,481 posts
- 16. #HookEm 4,216 posts
- 17. Duke 20.1K posts
- 18. Caicedo 48.4K posts
- 19. Caleb Downs 1,436 posts
- 20. The U 499K posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.