1/7 ⚛️ Level 1: Simple & straightforward grouping by file types. Good for small to medium projects, but maintenance can be a headache as the project grows. #React #FolderStructure
2/7 ⚛️ Level 2: Grouping by file types and features. Provides better organization, making it easier to locate and manage related code. Ideal for medium to large projects. #React #FolderStructure
3/7 ⚛️ Level 3: Highly modular approach, grouping by features/modules. Offers clear boundaries and scalability for large and complex projects. Requires good understanding of business logic. #React #FolderStructure
4/7 Give Consistent Meanings to Folder Names: UI Components React Specific Utilities & External Integrations Business Logic Styles TypeScript and Configurations Server Communication State Management Routing Testing
5/7 Conclusion: Choose the right folder structure based on project size and complexity. While Level 1 may suffice for small projects, Level 2 and Level 3 offer more organization and scalability. Consistent folder naming fosters intuitive architecture. #React #FolderStructure
6/7 Folder Structures in React Projects: Level 1: Simple & straightforward Level 2: Grouping by file types and features Level 3: Grouping by features/modules
7/7 Whether you're starting a new React project or improving an existing one, thoughtful folder structuring can greatly impact maintainability and scalability. Choose wisely! #React #FolderStructure #WebDev 🚀
United States Trendler
- 1. Carson Beck 3,738 posts
- 2. Vandy 12.8K posts
- 3. Miami 60.7K posts
- 4. Clemson 11.8K posts
- 5. Mario 64.8K posts
- 6. Lagway 1,535 posts
- 7. #UFCVegas110 4,159 posts
- 8. Jeff Sims 1,374 posts
- 9. Ohio State 17.7K posts
- 10. Texas 115K posts
- 11. Jeremiah Smith 9,249 posts
- 12. Dabo 3,012 posts
- 13. Georgia 39.9K posts
- 14. Dawson 4,703 posts
- 15. Vanderbilt 10.3K posts
- 16. #iufb 1,316 posts
- 17. Julian Sayin 7,218 posts
- 18. Gators 3,535 posts
- 19. Pavia 4,661 posts
- 20. Phil Rowe N/A
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.