1/7 ⚛️ Level 1: Simple & straightforward grouping by file types. Good for small to medium projects, but maintenance can be a headache as the project grows. #React #FolderStructure
2/7 ⚛️ Level 2: Grouping by file types and features. Provides better organization, making it easier to locate and manage related code. Ideal for medium to large projects. #React #FolderStructure
3/7 ⚛️ Level 3: Highly modular approach, grouping by features/modules. Offers clear boundaries and scalability for large and complex projects. Requires good understanding of business logic. #React #FolderStructure
4/7 Give Consistent Meanings to Folder Names: UI Components React Specific Utilities & External Integrations Business Logic Styles TypeScript and Configurations Server Communication State Management Routing Testing
5/7 Conclusion: Choose the right folder structure based on project size and complexity. While Level 1 may suffice for small projects, Level 2 and Level 3 offer more organization and scalability. Consistent folder naming fosters intuitive architecture. #React #FolderStructure
6/7 Folder Structures in React Projects: Level 1: Simple & straightforward Level 2: Grouping by file types and features Level 3: Grouping by features/modules
7/7 Whether you're starting a new React project or improving an existing one, thoughtful folder structuring can greatly impact maintainability and scalability. Choose wisely! #React #FolderStructure #WebDev 🚀
United States 趨勢
- 1. Baker 30.1K posts
- 2. #WWERaw 40.7K posts
- 3. Gibbs 19.9K posts
- 4. Mike Evans 9,733 posts
- 5. Lions 75.1K posts
- 6. Bucs 17.9K posts
- 7. Tez Johnson 3,020 posts
- 8. White House 243K posts
- 9. #OnePride 7,102 posts
- 10. Dan Campbell 1,765 posts
- 11. Goff 8,054 posts
- 12. Dragon Lee 6,653 posts
- 13. Josh Naylor 3,168 posts
- 14. #TBvsDET 4,932 posts
- 15. Whiteside N/A
- 16. Becky 52.1K posts
- 17. Bieber 17.8K posts
- 18. AJ Lee 10.1K posts
- 19. #LaCasaDeAlofoke2 5,312 posts
- 20. Kelvin Sheppard N/A
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.