Days/Months to mNAV cover is too generous in a bull run and too conservative in a bear dip... Perhaps we can improve on it by subtracting the efforts of king BTC and leaving just the efforts of the capital raisers instead? That would show who is being more industrious. To make…
Unsure if the math would work at first glance? If we exclude BTC price change effects, how do you calculate the treasury? Without the treasury, there's no mNAV to compute, creating a circular problem. Or do i misunderstand your point? P.s. i don't think we should overcomplicate…
To be fair, I like your idea of looking at days to cover sats per share. I.e. a BTCTC has 100 sats / share now, and you but it at a valuation of 200 sats / share. How long until they increase the sats per share to 200? This rewards non dilutive increases more and is more…
Agreed, months (days) to cover is a very misleading metric, especially the way it's presented in @_ALCPB website. In my opinion months to cover & PCV should be removed from analytics page. There also needs to be a legend explaining how each metric is calculated. Maybe one day
United States Trends
- 1. Chauncey Billups 49.8K posts
- 2. Chauncey Billups 49.8K posts
- 3. Damon Jones 12K posts
- 4. Mafia 90.1K posts
- 5. #7_years_with_ATEEZ 54.2K posts
- 6. #A_TO_Z 42.2K posts
- 7. #에이티즈_7주년_항해는_계속된다 42.3K posts
- 8. Kash Patel 34.3K posts
- 9. Toronto Rangers 1,981 posts
- 10. 5sos 29.3K posts
- 11. Gilbert Arenas 4,342 posts
- 12. The FBI 136K posts
- 13. Kirby Air Riders 6,668 posts
- 14. The NBA 181K posts
- 15. Adam Silver 4,090 posts
- 16. Gambling 107K posts
- 17. La Cosa Nostra 4,235 posts
- 18. #FalloutDay 2,442 posts
- 19. Changpeng Zhao 6,366 posts
- 20. Sakurai 10.3K posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.