Days/Months to mNAV cover is too generous in a bull run and too conservative in a bear dip... Perhaps we can improve on it by subtracting the efforts of king BTC and leaving just the efforts of the capital raisers instead? That would show who is being more industrious. To make…
Unsure if the math would work at first glance? If we exclude BTC price change effects, how do you calculate the treasury? Without the treasury, there's no mNAV to compute, creating a circular problem. Or do i misunderstand your point? P.s. i don't think we should overcomplicate…
To be fair, I like your idea of looking at days to cover sats per share. I.e. a BTCTC has 100 sats / share now, and you but it at a valuation of 200 sats / share. How long until they increase the sats per share to 200? This rewards non dilutive increases more and is more…
Agreed, months (days) to cover is a very misleading metric, especially the way it's presented in @_ALCPB website. In my opinion months to cover & PCV should be removed from analytics page. There also needs to be a legend explaining how each metric is calculated. Maybe one day
United States Trends
- 1. Good Tuesday 19.4K posts
- 2. Texans 38.6K posts
- 3. World Series 116K posts
- 4. Mariners 94.6K posts
- 5. Blue Jays 99.7K posts
- 6. #Talus_Labs N/A
- 7. CJ Stroud 6,893 posts
- 8. Sanae Takaichi 53.7K posts
- 9. Cobie 31.2K posts
- 10. StandX 4,782 posts
- 11. Springer 69.7K posts
- 12. Seahawks 37.6K posts
- 13. Nick Caley 2,718 posts
- 14. LA Knight 8,742 posts
- 15. Dodgers in 5 2,307 posts
- 16. East Wing 75.1K posts
- 17. Dan Wilson 4,339 posts
- 18. #LaCasaDeAlofoke2 15.9K posts
- 19. Joe Carter 3,256 posts
- 20. Financial 154K posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.