Days/Months to mNAV cover is too generous in a bull run and too conservative in a bear dip... Perhaps we can improve on it by subtracting the efforts of king BTC and leaving just the efforts of the capital raisers instead? That would show who is being more industrious. To make…
Unsure if the math would work at first glance? If we exclude BTC price change effects, how do you calculate the treasury? Without the treasury, there's no mNAV to compute, creating a circular problem. Or do i misunderstand your point? P.s. i don't think we should overcomplicate…
To be fair, I like your idea of looking at days to cover sats per share. I.e. a BTCTC has 100 sats / share now, and you but it at a valuation of 200 sats / share. How long until they increase the sats per share to 200? This rewards non dilutive increases more and is more…
Agreed, months (days) to cover is a very misleading metric, especially the way it's presented in @_ALCPB website. In my opinion months to cover & PCV should be removed from analytics page. There also needs to be a legend explaining how each metric is calculated. Maybe one day
United States 트렌드
- 1. Cheney 56.9K posts
- 2. Election Day 89.6K posts
- 3. Logan Wilson 5,116 posts
- 4. Good Tuesday 32.2K posts
- 5. GO VOTE 76.1K posts
- 6. #tuesdayvibe 1,804 posts
- 7. Cuomo 224K posts
- 8. New Jersey 164K posts
- 9. Jerry 44.8K posts
- 10. Virginia 175K posts
- 11. Halliburton 2,847 posts
- 12. Rolex 16.5K posts
- 13. Alex Karp 6,585 posts
- 14. VOTE TODAY 57.6K posts
- 15. For a 7th 10.7K posts
- 16. George W. Bush 10.3K posts
- 17. #TuesdayFeeling 1,165 posts
- 18. #tuesdaymotivations 1,077 posts
- 19. Tommy Robinson 36.8K posts
- 20. Jonathan Bailey 53.9K posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.