Amazing, but this 1997 paper already shows what (and why) we can learn from observational studies about the bounds of treatment effects in a randomized experiment marred by non-compliance👇🏻The rest is just a history of the neglect by the EBM promoters. #causaltwitter
Glad you mentioned "non-compliance". Indeed, this was one of the first tasks addressed and solved in do-calculus. See ucla.in/2pQ0Gvr. The paper also includes applications to real-life data -- pacifying those who claim such applications are missing from CI literature.
Yes, it's a good paper. Alex Balke was one of my best students, and this paper was part of his PhD dissertation. Too bad he did not go to academia.
It continues to amaze me how much we had by 1997, when I started at Queen's, yet we still haven’t used in 2023. Have these 3 decades been spent on coming to terms (as if it wasn't known before) that EBM truthers and their truth container can't compete with the scientific method?
United States الاتجاهات
- 1. Duke 32K posts
- 2. Auburn 40.5K posts
- 3. Bama 29.4K posts
- 4. Stockton 23.2K posts
- 5. Miami 133K posts
- 6. Ole Miss 38.4K posts
- 7. Lane Kiffin 48.3K posts
- 8. Stanford 9,795 posts
- 9. Notre Dame 25.7K posts
- 10. #SurvivorSeries 188K posts
- 11. Virginia 48.4K posts
- 12. Austin Theory 5,106 posts
- 13. Cam Coleman 2,004 posts
- 14. #Toonami 3,000 posts
- 15. #JimmySeaFanconD2 159K posts
- 16. Ewing 1,227 posts
- 17. Cooper Flagg 8,379 posts
- 18. Seth 21.4K posts
- 19. Oxford 22.3K posts
- 20. The ACC 32K posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.