Amazing, but this 1997 paper already shows what (and why) we can learn from observational studies about the bounds of treatment effects in a randomized experiment marred by non-compliance👇🏻The rest is just a history of the neglect by the EBM promoters. #causaltwitter
Glad you mentioned "non-compliance". Indeed, this was one of the first tasks addressed and solved in do-calculus. See ucla.in/2pQ0Gvr. The paper also includes applications to real-life data -- pacifying those who claim such applications are missing from CI literature.
Yes, it's a good paper. Alex Balke was one of my best students, and this paper was part of his PhD dissertation. Too bad he did not go to academia.
It continues to amaze me how much we had by 1997, when I started at Queen's, yet we still haven’t used in 2023. Have these 3 decades been spent on coming to terms (as if it wasn't known before) that EBM truthers and their truth container can't compete with the scientific method?
United States เทรนด์
- 1. #SurvivorSeries 89.2K posts
- 2. Liv Morgan 16.4K posts
- 3. Vandy 14.7K posts
- 4. John Cena 23.9K posts
- 5. Ty Simpson 1,589 posts
- 6. Auburn 17.1K posts
- 7. Roxanne 5,335 posts
- 8. Lash Legend 6,677 posts
- 9. Bama 16.9K posts
- 10. Norvell 4,648 posts
- 11. Rhea 18.1K posts
- 12. Oklahoma 31.2K posts
- 13. Mateer 7,755 posts
- 14. Tim Banks 3,111 posts
- 15. Dirty Dom 1,262 posts
- 16. Heupel 3,027 posts
- 17. Tennessee 43.6K posts
- 18. AJ Lee 12.4K posts
- 19. Dominik Mysterio 9,669 posts
- 20. Michigan 157K posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.